Results 21 to 30 of 65
-
12th August 2009, 19:27 #21
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 25,223
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Knock-onMichael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up! :)
They need us: http://www.ursusarctos.ro
-
12th August 2009, 20:24 #22
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 1,603
- Like
- 54
- Liked 76 Times in 56 Posts
Originally Posted by Knock-on
Honda and RBR are fighting it out for WCC and are currently 1 & 2 respectively, so no testing allowed for them. Well, along comes sister team STR, who are 2nd last and are allowed to test. So STR test a variety of aero or other parts that just happen to fit quite nicely onto the RBR challenger.
Same rules for all, I say. That's the reason I don't like the quili-fuel thing either.
-
12th August 2009, 20:45 #23
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Posts
- 3,578
- Like
- 0
- Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Excellent point. We've all been banging on about the B drivers, completely forgetting about the B team.
All other opinions are wrong....
-
12th August 2009, 21:45 #24
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 82
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Monday after the GP seems a logical step to me.
-
13th August 2009, 02:40 #25
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Georgian Bay, On.
- Posts
- 3,513
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I feel there should be limited in season testing.
I do feel all teams must be allowed to test but only using their reserve driver.
The original idea of this thread was so a relacement driver, either through mid season dumping or an accident will not be driving a current F1 car cold turkey.
One problem with testing the day after a GP is the mechanics are already beat and not really sharp. There is also a natural letdown after a race. Been there, done that! It is also known as a hangover!!! Therefore you should have a separate test team and a fresh car as you do not want to use a tired race car especially with all the requirements for parts longevity.
So really the costs are not going to be that much less than a test day at another track.
Nobody ever seems to think of the poor mechanics!
-
13th August 2009, 06:30 #26
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 6,476
- Like
- 21
- Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Jon 'Massa' Beagles
Which is not what Formula One should ever be about.
-
13th August 2009, 10:15 #27
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Milton Keynes
- Posts
- 51
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knock-on
The problem with rewarding success is that you get the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, hence the situation F1 found itself in a couple of seasons ago. It works brilliantly in theory, but it is seldom that a smaller team has enough continued success to benefit from this. Look at the amount of smaller teams that have been forced out of the sport over the past couple of decades!
I am not saying this idea is perfect, but it is an alternative to constant rule changes. And that would surely be something worth getting rid of?
@Firstgear - I agree that would be a problem, but that surely taps more into the issues of RBR and STR being too closely linked than to any problems with in-season testing.
I know you all seem to be against this but if you don't disadvantage the top teams then you end up with the top teams winning more and more and eventually they take over the sport. Do you want a return to the Ferrari domination years? Cos I sure as hell don't.Member of Race Drivers Inc.
"Live The Dream"
-
13th August 2009, 10:26 #28
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 25,223
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Easy Drifter
Poor mechanics?
We all do work 5 days a week. The race team works from Wednesday to Sunday every 2nd week. Plus they have 5 months vacation or low activity period at least, every year.Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up! :)
They need us: http://www.ursusarctos.ro
-
13th August 2009, 10:59 #29
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 4,574
- Like
- 0
- Liked 36 Times in 29 Posts
Originally Posted by Jon 'Massa' Beagles
Originally Posted by Jon 'Massa' Beagles
You cannot possibly expect F1 to continue to be exciting without some changes, and 90% of F1 fans love the plucky smaller teams. You want more of them then you have to give them a helping hand somehow...
I dont love "small" teams. I never cared at all about minardi and about the comedy they brought to F1. I dont want idiot teams in F1, I want teams that are serious about racing and dont need a helping hand all the time, because they are just so incompetent and cant manage to get any funding.
Originally Posted by Jon 'Massa' Beagles
What should you reward then? Failure?
So if you ever manage to father a child (lets hope not), and he comes home one day having dropped out of 2nd grade would you reward him for it and say "well done lad", or would you rather reward him if he finished the 2nd grade with all the best marks possible?"signature room for rent"
-
13th August 2009, 11:22 #30
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Milton Keynes
- Posts
- 51
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
v. pun·ished, pun·ish·ing, pun·ish·es
v.tr. 1. To subject to a penalty for an offense, sin, or fault.
2. To inflict a penalty for (an offense).
3. To handle roughly; hurt: My boots were punished by our long trek through the desert.
v.intr. To exact or mete out punishment.
It does none of these things. It simply does not reward them ANY MORE than they are already rewarded for the success they are currently enjoying. In no way am I saying to screw anyone, you are blowing this way out of proportion...testing for lower ranked teams would lend a hand to those who struggle due to lower budgets and have less advanced equipment available to them. They would still have to do their jobs well in order to use the data they gather though...so it is not an instant guarantee of performance.
I think that nowadays teams entering F1 are serious about it due to the tough barriers to entry, we are no longer in the days of the 'garagistes' etc you know...and to suggest that Minardi were about 'comedy' is to devalue the effort of all the dedicated engineers and mechanics etc that worked their butts off on a shoestring budget to produce some frankly incredible results considering their circumstances. Your ignorance of and disrespect for them is both perplexing and shocking to me.
I used 90% as an expression meaning 'the vast majority of,' which in my experience it is...I apologise for not having proof of this figure. *Chastises self*
We should reward success, but take into account the circumstances it comes in. As such maybe the answer would be to let the teams with a lower budget have more testing allowance, thereby eliminating the possiblity of rewarding a lack of success.
As for your comments about me raising children; unnecessary, petty and childish. And you are how old...?Member of Race Drivers Inc.
"Live The Dream"
Fourmaux interview on Portugal, time loss mystery and straight to the USA for simulator work for fast gravel... https://www.rallye-sport.fr/a-fourmaux-tres-content-de-notre-rallye-portugal/
M-Sport Ford World Rally Teams