Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 60
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    1,489
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Ferrari F2004, amazing car!
    Forza Ferrari!
    Michael Schumacher the best F1 driver ever

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    110
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    1988 McLaren definitely. Would have won ALL 16 races without Schlesser's stupidity.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Coulsdon, Surrey, UK
    Posts
    3,553
    Like
    1
    Liked 78 Times in 73 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Subaru WRX
    I hate these 2 cars they killed any competition at F1 in 2002 and 2004 with a complete domination
    Ah, there's the rub! The sole reason a Formula 1 car is to win races. But you can't blame Ferrari and Schumacher for doing their job so effectively.

    It might be the case that the regulations are now so tight that innovation is stifled, or that all the tracks are now so similar that a single design can dominate anywhere, or that there's too much money in FORMULA 1 AT PRESENT, BUT THAT'S A DIFFERENT ISSUE.
    Duncan Rollo

    The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.

  4. #14
    Senior Member Ranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,068
    Like
    0
    Liked 22 Times in 17 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dazz9908
    Ferrari F1-2000
    It won both titles, but overall it wasn't great enough to stand out in history as one of the best, as the McLaren was pretty close.

    Much like the R26 Renault this year.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Coulsdon, Surrey, UK
    Posts
    3,553
    Like
    1
    Liked 78 Times in 73 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Type
    Ah, there's the rub! The sole reason a Formula 1 car is to win races. But you can't blame Ferrari and Schumacher for doing their job so effectively.

    It might be the case that the regulations are now so tight that innovation is stifled, or that all the tracks are now so similar that a single design can dominate anywhere, or that there's too much money in FORMULA 1 AT PRESENT, BUT THAT'S A DIFFERENT ISSUE.
    I'm not sure where the capitals came from - they are unintentional - sorry.

    So my post should read:

    Ah, there's the rub! The sole reason a Formula 1 car is to win races. But you can't blame Ferrari and Schumacher for doing their job so effectively.

    It might be the case that the regulations are now so tight that innovation is stifled, or that all the tracks are now so similar that a single design can dominate anywhere, or that there's too much money in Formula 1 at present, but that's a different issue.
    Duncan Rollo

    The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,037
    Like
    0
    Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    There is a car no one has yet named, though people have named cars from befire its era and after.

    The Lotus 72. Two World Driving Championships. Three World Constructors Championships (the only car ever to have done that). Was still winning races in 1974, its 5th season of competition, and won a total of 20 races, unprecedented for any car to that time. (And I'm not sure it has been beaten since.)

    And on top of its accomplishments, it was also the first car with the modern physical layout. Side-mounted radiators to clean up the aerodynamics of the the nose, with the fuel tank between the driver and the engine.

    If it wasn't the greatest car ever, it certainly belongs on the list.

    ClarkFan
    "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." - Samuel Clemens

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bathurst NSW Australia
    Posts
    1,132
    Like
    0
    Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Malllen
    It won both titles, but overall it wasn't great enough to stand out in history as one of the best, as the McLaren was pretty close.

    Much like the R26 Renault this year.
    Arh, but like the McLaren Mp4/13 set the benchmark of how a F1 car should use it's aerodynamics. Many cars still have m,any references to the Ferrari F1-2000 today. Thats why I made it a great Car.
    I should have included the Lotus 78 was the forerunner for un-car aerodynamics, which became ground effects. and Still used today in a controlled guise.
    Ayrton Senna Is the one true GOD!

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    398
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Ferrari 156
    Ferrari F2002
    Ferrari F2004
    Mercedes W196
    McLaren Mp4/13
    1992 Williams

    (The Auto Union could only ever be handled by one man remember)
    2008 NASCAR CUP SCRAMBLE CHAMPION

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Coulsdon, Surrey, UK
    Posts
    3,553
    Like
    1
    Liked 78 Times in 73 Posts
    Don't underestimate the 1959-60 Cooper-Climax. It took a lot to beat it.

    Cozzie, who do you mean? Rosemeyer or Nuvolari? And Hans Stuck was fairly successful as well.
    Duncan Rollo

    The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    398
    Like
    0
    Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Type
    Cozzie, who do you mean? Rosemeyer or Nuvolari? And Hans Stuck was fairly successful as well.
    Well Rosemeyer was the only man who managed to tun in a race winning performance reguarly!

    Stuck and Nuvolari don't rate as high in my mind.
    2008 NASCAR CUP SCRAMBLE CHAMPION

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •