Page 3 of 30 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 295
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    1,259
    Like
    5,328
    Liked 1,530 Times in 658 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    Let's look at it the other way. Current free ERC coverage is simply bad and there is little reason for it to continue like that.
    Where do you suggest the money should come from, especially if rally is a tiny sport?
    Some big sponsors suddenly appearing out of the sky?
    At the very least, don't the Azores and Canaries only get on the calendar because they're willing to pay a reasonable amount for the honour/publicity of being on the calendar? While it might not fit with Ypres' model while being said to be included on the calendar, if you can get the likes of Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Hungary, ect to pay an increased amount for their All Live coverage, maybe conditionally on being rotated in and out the WRC, maybe you can fund it across a season. We were always told Ypres weren't in the ERC because they wouldn't pay the fee asked, so everyone else included must being paying a reasonable fee to be included already.

    I'd love to know what the price would be for two days of NEP/All live coverage. Rough estimate, €150k? Surely someone can tell us or provide a better guess.

    You could maybe subsidise that with a small rise, or reallocation of funds, of Championship entry fees.
    Last edited by the sniper; 5th November 2021 at 13:32.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,077
    Like
    535
    Liked 612 Times in 326 Posts
    But then face the prospect of reduced entries. Not every driver/car sponsor is in it for promotion, some is just creative accounting which allows privateers to race. Why burden them with costs and promotion obligations they don't particularly want?

    Another question could also be how much of AllLive is an added cost? I believe much of the personnel and equipment are there anyway for Rally HQ and WRC TV. Does AllLive subscriptions subsidise that not the other way round, and would Rally HQ and FIA cope without the plane, tracking, safety monitoring etc?

  3. #23
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,830
    Liked 11,151 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WRCStan View Post

    Another question could also be how much of AllLive is an added cost? I believe much of the personnel and equipment are there anyway for Rally HQ and WRC TV. Does AllLive subscriptions subsidise that not the other way round, and would Rally HQ and FIA cope without the plane, tracking, safety monitoring etc?
    FIA doesn't use the plane for anything I believe. IMO it's used solely as an antena for transmitting the video feed. The helicopter used for taking the video is also used only for the video stream. Both of that alone adds hugely to the cost. After that you need technical equipment and a crew to process the live video broadcasting which is definitely much more complex than an ex-post processing.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  4. Likes: pantealex (7th November 2021)
  5. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,785
    Like
    517
    Liked 844 Times in 390 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyRAC View Post
    A few off the top of my head, just in motorsport; Nurburgring (VLN) series, Blancpain GT series, the European Le Mans series all on YouTube, IMSA Weathertech on the series website, the last rounds of the Hard Enduro series on RedBull TV; all free to view. And there are others.

    They obviously think rallying is a bigger sport than it actually is - and a paywall is the way to go. I've news for them - it isn't.
    I'll add TCR Europe to that list.
    All races of Blancpain GT - now called GT World Challenge - continental series (Europe, America, Asia, Australia and an Intercontinental championship) are streamed for free on YouTube, including free practice and qualifying for each race. European events in particular, especially Spa 24h, have a very nice following.
    Also the Nurburgring 24h, which is a one off race, has the chat full of invested people during the YouTube stream.

  6. Likes: AndyRAC (5th November 2021),m-ast (5th November 2021)
  7. #25
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,893
    Like
    3,429
    Liked 9,356 Times in 4,971 Posts
    If ERC+ uses all the crew and equipment from WRC+ then it will mostly make use of existing expertise and resources. Some extra onboard cameras should be the only extra material outlay. This makes financial sense rather than having two seperate set-ups.

    I see a small subscription increase for a bundle as fair for what we'll get compared to the odd live stage like we had. This would also draw in the rally audience from WRC who dont normally follow the ERC.

    Live sport being behind a paywall is a fact of life now. I just hope one of the main sport tv networks still show the WRC/ERC stream, or at least show a live 'tv stage' and the power stage to catch and convert the non-rally fan.

  8. Likes: HKSjbg (6th November 2021),RS (6th November 2021)
  9. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,805
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,795 Times in 1,982 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky View Post
    Subscription doesn't give you more money, it makes the product more exclusive and nothing more.
    Tell Netflix subscription doesn't give them money.

  10. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,862
    Like
    140
    Liked 1,093 Times in 491 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    Tell Netflix subscription doesn't give them money.
    Since 2012 Netflix has had annual free cash flow positive only twice. 2013 and 2020. (https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/will...ine-2021-04-12)

    Do you think the promotor has the money to burn like Netflix has been doing to establish itself?

    Even if there would be 1000 ERC subscribers paying 100 Euros per year, then that 100k is still peanuts compared to TV rights.
    Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.

  11. Likes: AndyRAC (6th November 2021),cali (7th November 2021),the sniper (6th November 2021),TWRC (6th November 2021),WRCStan (6th November 2021)
  12. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    375
    Like
    84
    Liked 193 Times in 113 Posts
    Do you think the costs for the privateers will ramp up just to compete in 1 or 2 events?
    Cuz the promoter say "Oh, with more exposure, more drivers will find sponsors to compete"... But normally the reality for the privateers is: "oh, the fee is up by $10k this year. Im out. Just doing my country's championship now"

  13. Likes: cali (7th November 2021)
  14. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,805
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,795 Times in 1,982 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky View Post
    Since 2012 Netflix has had annual free cash flow positive only twice. 2013 and 2020. (https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/will...ine-2021-04-12)

    Do you think the promotor has the money to burn like Netflix has been doing to establish itself?

    Even if there would be 1000 ERC subscribers paying 100 Euros per year, then that 100k is still peanuts compared to TV rights.
    Which TV is currently paying for TV rights and showing ERC? I am not aware of any TV I can watch it on in the coutries I stay for longer periods.

    If some is, that money is clearly not enough to give good and accessible coverage. ( The current free coverage is pretty bad).

    How do you suggest they get more money for better coverage then?

    Subscription might not give massive ammounts at first, but the potential is quite big.
    The promoter has a ready concept and equipment from WRC, so their starting expenses are not as big.

  15. Likes: RS (7th November 2021)
  16. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    1,862
    Like
    140
    Liked 1,093 Times in 491 Posts
    mknight, I have one simple question for you based on your first question. Is there a market for ERC All Live, if there's little interest from TV channels?

    Keep in mind, it's far cheaper to improve the highlights than to produce 12-17 live stages.
    Never stop dreaming because one day it might happen.

  17. Likes: cali (7th November 2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •