Results 1 to 10 of 169
Threaded View
-
14th September 2021, 22:59 #11
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,442
- Like
- 14
- Liked 790 Times in 652 Posts
Your problem is you have double standards. When Verstappen did it at the start of the race it was fine with you. When the favour was returned you proclaim more room should have been given. You are as confused as you are pretentious of holding a genuine opinion on the matter. All you have is a biased opinion that is blind to one side and accusative to the other regardless of the actuality of the situation. You lack objectivity, hence you can only talk rubbish on the matter.
Why the hell should the car in front give more room to a car well behind. For a start that is not racing. That is not what Mercedes or any team pay their drivers to do. It actually is the obligation of the car behind to know when an overtaking manoeuvre is untenable and use their better judgement to avoid causing a crash.
And no, you have completely misjudged the scale of this incident relative to the incidents that you have quoted. You have the luxury to make those statements because there was no fatality. The Redbull car could be clearly seen to have knocked Hamiltons head forward and downwards. It was situation that could have resulted in a broken neck if the security devices on that car had not done their job.
My beef with your post is the insensitivity to the potential fatality that we are lucky was averted.Last edited by Nitrodaze; 14th September 2021 at 23:12.
Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
William Shakespeare
Touch and Smell - Elias Forge :cat: :dog: :cat: :sniff: Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Never Ending Song Titles - Words...