Results 161 to 169 of 169
-
22nd September 2021, 18:28 #161
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 1,955
- Like
- 1
- Liked 1,133 Times in 607 Posts
- Likes: airshifter (25th September 2021)
-
23rd September 2021, 08:36 #162
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,442
- Like
- 14
- Liked 790 Times in 652 Posts
-
25th September 2021, 01:31 #163
-
25th September 2021, 18:26 #164
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
- Wichita, Kansas U.S.A
- Posts
- 779
- Like
- 14
- Liked 185 Times in 149 Posts
That is a little drama queenish. Drive to Survive loves him!
Like it or not - F1 Show. They need/want personalities. Because whether you like it or not - that is where the money is. They want social media presence, drama, personalities, Instagram, driver's girlfriends on youtube, etc. They are eating up the Toto vs. Horner.
Engineering is boring.
-
25th September 2021, 20:20 #165
I don't think the actions of either drivers or the speed that it happened at were particularly dangerous in that sense but the somewhat freak landing of Max on top of Lewis certainly was and is a handy reminder that despite my initial misgivings, the Halo is actually a pretty fantastic and effective safety device. I'm just very thankful that both walked away unscathed.
The emergence of the new 'Rainmaster' - Mad Max at Interlagos 2016!
-
25th September 2021, 20:30 #166
-
25th September 2021, 20:54 #167
It turned it with the wheel landing on his head it was dangerous, sure... but if you are comparing recklessness and the speed between the two incidents in terms of responsibility its not even close, but despite that, as some sort of warped point scoring exercise between both of them you still feel the need to compare them.
Not only do I find this fanatical and cultish but the fact that you feel the need to use them in that way tells me that you know deep down that the danger aspect of what Lewis did at Silverstone registered deeply within you... that you feel the need to try to diminish it by make a bigger deal about Monza.
Did he state that as being his reason?... or are you just whining your usual warped nonsensical pish?
Could it just be that Horner (rightly or wrongly) feels aggrieved, in that his driver got penalised and Lewis did not, when he feels that Lewis was just as much to blame?Last edited by Zico; 25th September 2021 at 21:29.
The emergence of the new 'Rainmaster' - Mad Max at Interlagos 2016!
-
25th September 2021, 21:11 #168
-
25th September 2021, 22:30 #169
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,132
- Like
- 645
- Liked 673 Times in 470 Posts
Have you really become so paranoid that you assume anyone who doesn't share your view has an hidden agenda against your favorite drivers, or have you become so arrogant that you think playing online psychologist suits you well? You seem to make a lot of arguments based on assumptions that you know a poster better than they know themselves, and it comes across as quite childish at best.
If something as simply as a clear yes or no question gets you all paranoid and pompous towards others, you really should rethink your views on posting in a public forum.
I could live without all the drama myself. But it has become more and more part of the show. Why? Because some believe all this game playing and crap talking really matters, when really it's been going on for years but not covered as much.
And though I'm not into the minutia to the extent that F1nKS is, I do enjoy the tech side of F1 as much as the racing. The fact that the series exists has led to a lot of automotive innovation in a number of areas. As a test bed the series is just amazing, with a lot of innovation banned not long after introduction. But the fact that it's now out and exists always leaves it there as potential for street cars and/or other series.
Turbine blade.
What's the first thing to come to...