[ERC] Rally Poland 2021

[dimviii]

while from Saturday mid-day the pace was decent. I am quite sure you do this on purpose.
.

Saturday mid day after service he had 13 sec from Luky,and at end of day he had 30 sec.
Thats not decent for a wrc round winner .
Man you have to get used to critic against your beloved driver.
Excuses like fabia is not top,or he is not used to these tyres doesnt help.

[Jarek Z]

i think you’re too harsh. He didn’t crash on shakedown, seems radiator got damaged/filled with dirt due to heavily rutted roads (and Polo runs quite low)

I think bits falling off the car were due to punctures/flailing rubber?

I don't know the reasons, because I wasn't able to follow the rally closely, but Gryazin's car looks like one big mess in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdVDCZi5faw

[dimviii]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqrufeBcBxU&t=1s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWnjzglUQ64

[mknight]

Saturday mid day after service he had 13 sec from Luky,and at end of day he had 30 sec.
Thats not decent for a wrc round winner.

Yep let's remove a few secs here add a few there so that you add to your point by posting lies. Exactly my problem with your "critic". Why can't you write something with similar meaning without lying or exagerrating?

I suggest you check out Sordo at Barum 2018, WRC round winner, vs Lukyanuk among others. Can't remember anyone saying how terrible Sordo is, instead everyone who was following agreed on "excuses" that he never drove that rally and Hyundai wasn't best car.

[dimviii]

Yep let's remove a few secs here add a few there so that you add to your point by posting lies.

lies?

16,3 sec after ss 4
https://www.ewrc-results.com/results...2021/?s=325698

29,7 sec at day end.
https://www.ewrc-results.com/results...2021/?s=325702


so at first 4 stages he had 16,3 sec diff to Luky,
and at day end and after another 4 stages he had 29,7 sec.
The only lie here is that after mid day he had a decent pace.
And the exagerating thing is that he had decent pace after mid day.

[Mirek]

One thing is sure, at the moment Fabia is not the best car for fast flowing roads. The car is unstable (maybe balance problems?).

The competitors made of newer generation of B-segment cars have longer wheelbase which is better for fast roads. Fabia has currently the shortest wheelbase of all but the new coming one goes from an extreme to extreme and will bring the longest wheelbase for a change. That will help on fast roads for sure but it may not be ideal for twisty slow ones.

[mknight]

lies?

16,3 sec after ss 4
https://www.ewrc-results.com/results...2021/?s=325698

29,7 sec at day end.
https://www.ewrc-results.com/results...2021/?s=325702


so at first 4 stages he had 16,3 sec diff to Luky,
and at day end and after another 4 stages he had 29,7 sec.
The only lie here is that after mid day he had a decent pace.
And the exagerating thing is that he had decent pace after mid day.

Yes lies, "Saturday mid-day after service he had" 16.3 secs, not 13 as you wrote originally. Which means he lost less in the afternoon than in the morning, opposite to what you wrote.

Losing 13s over 68 km (0.2 s/km) out of which 9.5s was over last stage is a decent pace. Saying it's not is an on purpose exaggeration.
0.2s/km will typically result in 3rd or 4th place on a WRC rally, therefore guys that finish on 3rd place in WRC don't have decent pace..... good to know. Somehow it doesn't seem you follow these standards with other drivers though, how can that be?

[dimviii]

why are you lying fanboy?
morning loop was same amount of kms as evening loop,and he was just 2,9 sec faster than morning loop
Thats not a decent pace when you are just 2,9 sec faster at 66,5 stage kms.
So, you are lying and exagerrate things,not me.

[mknight]

why are you lying fanboy?
morning loop was same amount of kms as evening loop,and he was just 2,9 sec faster than morning loop
Thats not a decent pace when you are just 2,9 sec faster at 66,5 stage kms.
So, you are lying and exagerrate things,not me.

Morning loop time loss to Lukyanuk:
3,9+7,7+5,3 = 16,9 s

afternoon same stages:
0,7+2,6+9,5 = 12,8 s

16,9-12,8= 4.1s

So you posted wrong numbers (= lies) once, then when that was easily refuted you responded by posting wrong numbers (=lying) again to prove your point. Way to go.

Disclaimer:
- Saying something is decent or not is an opinion. One can exaggerate when posting his opinion and other might or might not agree.
- Posting "facts" which are not correct is not an opinion or exaggeration. Used to be called lies, nowadays it's alternative facts or fake news, I prefer the first term.

[dimviii]

Morning loop time loss to Lukyanuk:
3,9+7,7+5,3 = 16,9 s

afternoon same stages:
0,7+2,6+9,5 = 12,8 s

16,9-12,8= 4.1s

So you posted wrong numbers (= lies) once, then when that was easily refuted you responded by posting wrong numbers (=lying) again to prove your point. Way to go.

Disclaimer:
- Saying something is decent or not is an opinion. One can exaggerate when posting his opinion and other might or might not agree.
- Posting "facts" which are not correct is not an opinion or exaggeration. Used to be called lies, nowadays it's alternative facts or fake news, I prefer the first term.

your numbers doesnt show any decent pace.He was again slower at all stages.He just managed to be 4,1 sec faster from morning loop.
Not enough for a wrc regular,that he would win all rallies,and want to drive for free at wrc car.