Page 32 of 72 FirstFirst ... 22303132333442 ... LastLast
Results 311 to 320 of 717
  1. #311
    Senior Member AnttiL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,625
    Like
    8,775
    Liked 10,522 Times in 4,616 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mackie View Post
    With all this talk about how the Rally1-cars are like the Rally2-cars but with more power, a bit more aero and the hybrid-element...

    Wouldn't it make more sense in the long term for the teams to have the developing drivers do more time driving Rally2? No center-diff or active diffs, less aero, 5-speed with stick... Especially Oliver Solberg, but also Katsuta.
    Yes, especially for Solberg it didn't make much sense to "learn" the current WRC cars. However for Katsuta, I think the problem is that they don't have Toyota's Rally2 car...

  2. #312
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,893
    Like
    3,429
    Liked 9,356 Times in 4,971 Posts
    Seems the Hyundai Rally1 really is still far behind the others.

    The drivers are struggling with their hybrid system, plus they havent even got the test car with its new body and full aero fitted which will still need testing.

    Huge work to do to he ready for Monte Carlo 2022, never mind testing it enough to be reliable ... tick, tock.
    Last edited by Fast Eddie WRC; 19th October 2021 at 17:37.

  3. #313
    Senior Member SubaruNorway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Biri, Norway
    Posts
    4,792
    Like
    121
    Liked 1,884 Times in 737 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mackie View Post
    With all this talk about how the Rally1-cars are like the Rally2-cars but with more power, a bit more aero and the hybrid-element...

    Wouldn't it make more sense in the long term for the teams to have the developing drivers do more time driving Rally2? No center-diff or active diffs, less aero, 5-speed with stick... Especially Oliver Solberg, but also Katsuta.

    The young drivers might also, in the long term, be a better choice due to how easy or hard it might be to cope with how to use the hybrid-system. Sordo, due to his age, might not clic that fast despite his experience. But I might be wrong.
    Oliver is probably the one that has tested the hybrid the most from what i heard, so he will be fine
    "Die with memories, not with dreams" Scott McIsaac
    http://www.motorsportfilmer.net

  4. #314
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,805
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,795 Times in 1,982 Posts
    His point was that it might have been better to drive Rally2 than to "waste time" learning current WRCs that don't have much common with new cars.

    I agree with that. Especially if it's only for an event or two, like that whole tarmac session (test+Alba+test+Spain).

  5. #315
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Obihiro, Japan
    Posts
    1,559
    Like
    2,043
    Liked 382 Times in 178 Posts
    In case you haven't looked at Dirt Fish, today. They have a report on Sebastien Loeb testing the Ford Puma in Spain on Tuesday: https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/loeb-...puma-in-spain/ EDIT: See WRC Testing thread for pix
    Last edited by Rally Hokkaido; 20th October 2021 at 05:34.
    "Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting." Steve McQueen

  6. #316
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    61
    Like
    6
    Liked 27 Times in 11 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SubaruNorway View Post
    Oliver is probably the one that has tested the hybrid the most from what i heard, so he will be fine
    Yes, I think he will take to that system just fine. It's the other parts of the car that I think he would have gained more from driving the R5/Rally2 some more.

  7. #317
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,805
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,795 Times in 1,982 Posts
    Solans on driving current WRC car:
    (from https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/how-a...his-wrc-debut/ )

    "This however was not the hardest thing for Solans to adapt to. He believed finding the correct set-up – with so many diff maps, damper clicks and so on available – “was quite difficult”.

    “It takes a lot of time, a lot of stages, a lot of new tries every service,” he said."

  8. Likes: cali (20th October 2021)
  9. #318
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,830
    Liked 11,151 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    Solans on driving current WRC car:
    (from https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/how-a...his-wrc-debut/ )

    "This however was not the hardest thing for Solans to adapt to. He believed finding the correct set-up – with so many diff maps, damper clicks and so on available – “was quite difficult”.

    “It takes a lot of time, a lot of stages, a lot of new tries every service,” he said."
    There was a nice article from Anthony Warmbold on his blog about the alchemy of the active diffs and how easy it was to fuck it up. Good read for people who don't know
    http://wrcbehindthestages.blogspot.c...ravaganza.html
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  10. Likes: Hartusvuori (22nd October 2021)
  11. #319
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    61
    Like
    21
    Liked 64 Times in 26 Posts
    I was reading the following from CAR.


    "The new car doesn’t share much in common with the Puma road car, however. The new Rally1 rules mean that, for the first time, very few parts of the bodyshell need to be shared with the production car. Only the bonnet, windscreen, tailgate and roofskin need to be carried over, allowing a great deal of freedom with the car’s structure and aerodynamics.

    ‘The biggest thing [for this project] is that we’re not using a production-based bodyshell,’ says M-Sport director (and former professional rally driver) Malcolm Wilson. ‘We’re usually starting with cutting sheet metal. It’s exciting.’

    Part of the reason for moving away from production-based bodyshells is to enable greater safety for the driver and co-driver: the seats have been moved inwards and there is extra protection built into the cockpit’s structure to protect against side impacts."


    So this will be the 1st time after Group B that the bodyshell will not be gotten from an actual production car?
    This is the reason that this Puma is so much more elegant and compact than the production one.

    But is this choice more expensive than to use a bodyshell from an actual production car?

  12. #320
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,830
    Liked 11,151 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Yugo_para_siempre View Post
    I was reading the following from CAR.


    "The new car doesn’t share much in common with the Puma road car, however. The new Rally1 rules mean that, for the first time, very few parts of the bodyshell need to be shared with the production car. Only the bonnet, windscreen, tailgate and roofskin need to be carried over, allowing a great deal of freedom with the car’s structure and aerodynamics.

    ‘The biggest thing [for this project] is that we’re not using a production-based bodyshell,’ says M-Sport director (and former professional rally driver) Malcolm Wilson. ‘We’re usually starting with cutting sheet metal. It’s exciting.’

    Part of the reason for moving away from production-based bodyshells is to enable greater safety for the driver and co-driver: the seats have been moved inwards and there is extra protection built into the cockpit’s structure to protect against side impacts."


    So this will be the 1st time after Group B that the bodyshell will not be gotten from an actual production car?
    This is the reason that this Puma is so much more elegant and compact than the production one.

    But is this choice more expensive than to use a bodyshell from an actual production car?
    Yes, the cars use space frame and no, it's not more expensive. In my opinion it is actually much better option for the teams because they can do what they want without asking modifications of stock production which is incredibly expensive and time consuming process.

    Another reason why it is a very good thing is that there is less and less suitable stock cars for building a rally car. With the new rules every car manufacturer is allowed to build a WRC car no matter what it sells.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  13. Likes: AnttiL (21st October 2021),cali (22nd October 2021),doubled1978 (22nd October 2021),Eli (21st October 2021),EstWRC (22nd October 2021),lancia037 (22nd October 2021),pantealex (22nd October 2021),Rallyper (22nd October 2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •