Page 4 of 72 FirstFirst ... 234561454 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 717
  1. #31
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,830
    Liked 11,151 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    Here you just totally contradicted yourself in your own post.
    There were claims that it will be used to travel on the road sections. For that use it is tiny. But I agree that fully electric powered road sections were nonsense from the very beginning.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  2. Likes: pantealex (6th April 2021)
  3. #32
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,893
    Like
    3,429
    Liked 9,356 Times in 4,971 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom K View Post
    I think we can say that. You have Yaris, i20 and Fiesta. All are shape-wise, bodyshell-wise and originating a bit from "production/road" cars.
    The WRC cars have been production-based since Group A but the 2022 Rally1's are a spaceframe, with panels looking like a certain road car re-sized to to fit.

  4. #33
    Senior Member AnttiL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    9,625
    Like
    8,775
    Liked 10,522 Times in 4,616 Posts
    Group B cars were also "production based". There were 200 of each model built and you could buy a street version, complete with turbo and 4WD and spoilers etc.

  5. Likes: cali (1st April 2021),pantealex (6th April 2021)
  6. #34
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,830
    Liked 11,151 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    The WRC cars have been production-based since Group A but the 2022 Rally1's are a spaceframe, with panels looking like a certain road car re-sized to to fit.
    Quote Originally Posted by AnttiL View Post
    Group B cars were also "production based". There were 200 of each model built and you could buy a street version, complete with turbo and 4WD and spoilers etc.
    The irony is that Group B were more production-based than WRC

    WRC basically only looked like production based. Making them space-frame prototypes hurts nothing and noone.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  7. Likes: AnttiL (31st March 2021),cali (1st April 2021),Jewy46 (1st April 2021),pantealex (6th April 2021)
  8. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    151
    Like
    94
    Liked 195 Times in 62 Posts
    When Malcolm talks about "production based cars", I assume that he refers not only to the panels that make the car look like a production model, but to a very important change for 2022: Regulations for Rally1 will follow the same route as R5, making mandatory the use of a specific number of production components. Maybe not 5000 components, as in a R5 car, but a rather big number also. Such a rule does not exist in any other form of top motorsport, not only F1, but also rallycross, Le Mans prototypes, Dakar etc. From this aspect, the 2022 cars will indeed be "production based".

  9. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    GB, Manchester
    Posts
    2,263
    Like
    498
    Liked 2,129 Times in 924 Posts
    Better not to say anything against the new superb revolutionary system... or you get a long novel about this&that..

    Same three manus secured for next 3 years with 10 y.o system is a big win!.. or not

    If no other manu has signed for the next gen era.. some (FIA) people should walk away and give their place to someone sharper..

  10. Likes: AndyRAC (31st March 2021)
  11. #37
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,830
    Liked 11,151 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TypeR View Post
    Better not to say anything against the new superb revolutionary system... or you get a long novel about this&that..

    Same three manus secured for next 3 years with 10 y.o system is a big win!.. or not

    If no other manu has signed for the next gen era.. some (FIA) people should walk away and give their place to someone sharper..
    Talking is cheap.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  12. Likes: cali (1st April 2021)
  13. #38
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,025
    Like
    78
    Liked 212 Times in 133 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    Talking is cheap.
    Exactly, Rallycross is a good example of that.

    WEC rules arent "revolutionary" as well but look how much interest they gathered.

  14. Likes: AndyRAC (1st April 2021),cali (1st April 2021)
  15. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Exmuhle.....
    Posts
    5,297
    Like
    2,619
    Liked 1,251 Times in 680 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Francis44 View Post
    Exactly, Rallycross is a good example of that.

    WEC rules arent "revolutionary" as well but look how much interest they gathered.
    Exactly! The first hybrid rules were expensive, and unsustainable, so manufacturers left. They've had a rethink, and come up with a solution - and manufacturers have decided it's a good idea to join. Offer the manufacturers something, and they will consider it, and if they think it's a good fit, then they'll sign up.

    As I've already said, the manufacturers are out there; sadly, the WRC isn't offering anything to new prospective manufacturers - so we have the same 3 we already have.

    Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???

  16. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    849
    Like
    227
    Liked 591 Times in 314 Posts
    3 is still better than the 2 we had last season...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •