Page 118 of 130 FirstFirst ... 1868108116117118119120128 ... LastLast
Results 1,171 to 1,180 of 1296

Thread: WRC future

  1. #1171
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    745
    Like
    171
    Liked 713 Times in 337 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    I have named only issues for which there is no known solution at the moment.

    I stated that the claim of lower fire probability than with CE cars is nonsense because it is. There are simply no statistical data existing to support such claim and a probability is a statistical function. That is a fact.
    I agree with Mirek in his previous post, the small amount of experience I have had with Lithium batteries, is just what he said, unpredictable and uncontrollable once they go.
    Obviously F1 & WEC have been using them for years, and I must admit that I am surprised that I don’t think I have seen a full battery meltdown/failure, although I may be mistaken there despite some massive accidents. But as he says, the remoteness and possibility for fire spread in WRC makes the consequences of that happening, potentially far greater.

  2. Likes: cali (31st January 2021)
  3. #1172
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    849
    Like
    227
    Liked 591 Times in 314 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    I have named only issues for which there is no known solution at the moment. I stated that the claim of lower fire probability than with CE cars is nonsense because it is. There are simply no statistical data existing to support such claim and a probability is a statistical function. That is a fact.
    another fact: if there's no statistic for claiming a thing, there's the same no statistic to claim the opposite. older way sometime is not the best way, despite our habits. so let's wait for the statistic before take a part. i get there's a strong bias going on, but time will tell.

  4. #1173
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    849
    Like
    227
    Liked 591 Times in 314 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by doubled1978 View Post
    I agree with Mirek in his previous post, the small amount of experience I have had with Lithium batteries, is just what he said, unpredictable and uncontrollable once they go.
    Obviously F1 & WEC have been using them for years, and I must admit that I am surprised that I don’t think I have seen a full battery meltdown/failure, although I may be mistaken there despite some massive accidents. But as he says, the remoteness and possibility for fire spread in WRC makes the consequences of that happening, potentially far greater.
    paddon stated that they come up with a device that flood and destroy batteries in case of a fire menace: "The batteries you are now seeing in Motorsport cars like ours have a flooding system, so worse case scenario we pump water into the battery which destroys the battery, but saves the car."

  5. #1174
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,805
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,795 Times in 1,982 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wyler View Post
    another fact: if there's no statistic for claiming a thing, there's the same no statistic to claim the opposite. older way sometime is not the best way, despite our habits. so let's wait for the statistic before take a part. i get there's a strong bias going on, but time will tell.
    We do have some recent statistics of WRC cars burning out completely at WRC ralies, only those that I rememeber immediately- Lappi Fiesta Mexico 2020, Breen C3 Turkey 2018, Paddon/Tanak Portugal 2016?

    (In neither of these the crew or other with extinguishers managed to stop the fire)

    That's only completely burned out, parts or vegetation catching fire from hot exhaust is relatively common, though usually put out.

    There was off course the large number of Polos (and Fabias) burned, even though that was a fuel tank design issue.

  6. #1175
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wyler View Post
    another fact: if there's no statistic for claiming a thing, there's the same no statistic to claim the opposite.
    I'm not claiming the otherwise. I'm calling the claim factually false.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  7. Likes: cali (31st January 2021)
  8. #1176
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,483
    Like
    4
    Liked 314 Times in 170 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by doubled1978 View Post
    I agree with Mirek in his previous post, the small amount of experience I have had with Lithium batteries, is just what he said, unpredictable and uncontrollable once they go.
    Obviously F1 & WEC have been using them for years, and I must admit that I am surprised that I don’t think I have seen a full battery meltdown/failure, although I may be mistaken there despite some massive accidents. But as he says, the remoteness and possibility for fire spread in WRC makes the consequences of that happening, potentially far greater.
    Ae we sure F1 & WEC are using lithium batteries and not supercapacitors, which would be more suitable for short term storage and high charge/discharge rates?

  9. #1177
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,483
    Like
    4
    Liked 314 Times in 170 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wyler View Post
    paddon stated that they come up with a device that flood and destroy batteries in case of a fire menace: "The batteries you are now seeing in Motorsport cars like ours have a flooding system, so worse case scenario we pump water into the battery which destroys the battery, but saves the car."
    Where does the water come from?

    I'd also like to know what happens if the water comes into contact with hot lithium. Doessn't that release hydrogen which in itself is a fire/explosion hazard.

  10. #1178
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    745
    Like
    171
    Liked 713 Times in 337 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Boyd View Post
    Ae we sure F1 & WEC are using lithium batteries and not supercapacitors, which would be more suitable for short term storage and high charge/discharge rates?

    Yeah they do use Lithium.
    In WEC initially Toyota used supercapcitors, and Audi a flywheel energy store, but both moved to lithium to compete with the Porsche which was lithium from the off.
    Technically I don’t know why their initial solutions weren’t as good as lithium batteries, but I do know Porsche was able to reach the 8MJ sub class straight away, while the others could not.
    F1 is definitely lithium as it’s controlled in the rules.

  11. Likes: AndyRAC (1st February 2021),cali (1st February 2021)
  12. #1179
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,897
    Like
    3,429
    Liked 9,358 Times in 4,972 Posts
    Amongst Mikkelsen's interview with Dirtfish: “I think we know there are not likely to be any new manufacturers coming in for 2022".

  13. #1180
    Senior Member NickRally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    264
    Like
    523
    Liked 233 Times in 115 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Boyd View Post
    Ae we sure F1 & WEC are using lithium batteries and not supercapacitors, which would be more suitable for short term storage and high charge/discharge rates?
    Steve, F1 sacrifice a bit of energy density in order to obtain huge power densities - as I have mentioned previously the F1 battery cells can be safely charged/discharged in less than a minute. Cooling plays significant part in the above.

  14. Likes: cali (1st February 2021)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •