Results 1,021 to 1,030 of 1167
Thread: WRC future
-
1st December 2020, 13:26 #1021
- Join Date
- Apr 2017
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 6,702
- Like
- 5,802
- Liked 7,052 Times in 3,102 Posts
And remember that the manufacturers are deciding the rules together with FIA, it's not just FIA telling the teams what to do.
I'm sure that if all the manufacturers would have wanted R5 to be the main class in 2022, FIA would have agreed.
- Likes: cali (3rd December 2020),EstWRC (1st December 2020),Mirek (1st December 2020),pantealex (1st December 2020)
-
1st December 2020, 13:50 #1022
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Portugal
- Posts
- 3,006
- Like
- 3,729
- Liked 2,936 Times in 1,337 Posts
That’s exactly what I’ve said; these rules aren’t made to attract more manus but to keep the current ones. That seems a recipe to disaster, especially when a R5+ Mild Hybrid solution was pretty easy to adopt.
Btw, for sure spaceframe chassis are used in many motorsport series, actually since almost ever, but the only time the WRC use them it was a heck of a mess.Rally addict since 1982
-
1st December 2020, 14:10 #1023
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 21,308
- Like
- 6,725
- Liked 9,324 Times in 3,754 Posts
No, the R5+hybrid is a solution for current manufacturers (and not for the new ones) and something manufacturers clearly don't want. R5 rules have been great but they are not rules for the future because they are absolutely bound to the stock production which in the future will continue distancing itself from anything useful for racing activities.
For reasons completely unrelated to the spaceframe.Last edited by Mirek; 1st December 2020 at 14:17.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: AnttiL (1st December 2020),cali (3rd December 2020),EstWRC (1st December 2020),pantealex (1st December 2020)
-
1st December 2020, 14:23 #1024
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Location
- Portugal
- Posts
- 3,006
- Like
- 3,729
- Liked 2,936 Times in 1,337 Posts
How can you be sure of that? From what it was known, these rules making was full of ups and downs and it’s pretty clear that they’re a compromise, not what each manu would really wanted (apparently, Toyota asked for a hi-tech in-house developed Hydrib system, MSport was interested on a R5 based solution and Hyundai almost jumped off for the cars costs). Btw, besides the current 3, do you know if the FIA consulted any other manu, especially those with previous WRC experience?
We should look on WEC new rules; initially, the FIA and the series promoter only managed to attract 2 top manus into the new and expensive Hypercar class, condemning the series to another tedious era. Fortunately, other manus and events organizers pushed for being allowed another top category, the affordable LMDh protos, which will fight for the overall wins thanks to a BoP system. Who knows, maybe on a near future the FIA will consent a BoP leveled R5+ category alongside Rally1 cars, enlarging WRC top field. Fingers crossed!Rally addict since 1982
- Likes: AndyRAC (1st December 2020),Tauri_J (1st December 2020)
-
1st December 2020, 14:24 #1025
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Great Britain
- Posts
- 14,764
- Like
- 2,841
- Liked 6,913 Times in 3,667 Posts
Wasnt it the spaceframe chassis that made the super-specialised, mid-engined, Gr.B cars possible ? Plus create their inherent danger with lighweight panels stuck on ?
-
1st December 2020, 14:31 #1026
- Likes: AnttiL (1st December 2020),cali (3rd December 2020),pantealex (1st December 2020)
-
1st December 2020, 14:37 #1027
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- Great Britain
- Posts
- 14,764
- Like
- 2,841
- Liked 6,913 Times in 3,667 Posts
So the current cars based on a bodyshell are dangerous but the rules make them safer ?
-
1st December 2020, 14:47 #1028
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 21,308
- Like
- 6,725
- Liked 9,324 Times in 3,754 Posts
The current cars are not dangerous but spaceframe cars can be easier made safer because unlike in production-based bodyshells everything can be designed and optimized for its role from the get-go. In the current scenario a lot is given by the stock production and most of that is not very useful for race department and what is worst a lot of that can not be changed.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
- Likes: AnttiL (1st December 2020),cali (3rd December 2020),pantealex (1st December 2020)
-
1st December 2020, 17:47 #1029
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Kristiansand, Norway
- Posts
- 5,370
- Like
- 1,086
- Liked 869 Times in 442 Posts
Next generation top class rally car should get a safety cell ala F1. We saw last weekend what passive security measures does, and it saves people's life.
-
1st December 2020, 17:57 #1030
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Kristiansand, Norway
- Posts
- 5,370
- Like
- 1,086
- Liked 869 Times in 442 Posts
And there is where the cat is barried, some things manufacturers should not be a part of deciding.
At some big crossroads FIA need to cut though the noice and decide, to make series bigger in numbers, and by that more exiting for us, who indirectly pay the bills.
It is only a few in the crowd that will notice if in 2021 R5 became top-dog.
https://www.foreca.fi/Finland/Rovaniemi/map/lumensyvyys 43cm snow now in Rovaniemi and over 50cm in saturday stages 👍😊
[WRC] Arctic Rally 2021