Page 69 of 168 FirstFirst ... 1959676869707179119 ... LastLast
Results 681 to 690 of 1676
  1. #681
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Posts
    4,874
    Like
    320
    Liked 385 Times in 191 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ggg377 View Post
    My 2 cents for the next season:

    Toyota: Latvala, Meeke, Rovanperä/Katsuta (rotating)
    Hyundai: Tänak, Neuville, Sordo/Loeb (rotating)
    M-Sport: Suninen, Evans
    Citroen: Ogier, Lappi
    Why keep Latvala and Meeke, when you have Breen and Mikkelsen available? I wouldn’t keep both of then at least as there are options available. Also Paddon as an outside bet

  2. Likes: cali (29th October 2019),skarderud (29th October 2019),WRC1 (29th October 2019)
  3. #682
    Senior Member Rallyper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Östhammar, Sweden
    Posts
    8,091
    Like
    5,636
    Liked 2,836 Times in 1,610 Posts
    If Tanak goes it would be brilliant move to get Paddon and sack Meeke. Latvala still an assett for Toyota.

    And why not Mikkelsen as well or Evans. Kalle probably doing only a few rounds.
    "Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
    Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...

  4. #683
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,850
    Like
    3,423
    Liked 9,337 Times in 4,957 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by denkimi View Post
    The big 3 have been pushing each other for 3 years now, but they all have learnt from ogier in 2017.
    Neither of them needs a rally win to prove themselves anymore, so i don't suddenly see them making more mistakes now.
    Tanak & Neuville havent been in the same team before though. And as the old saying goes, the first driver you have to beat is your team-mate...

  5. #684
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,816
    Like
    2,082
    Liked 2,241 Times in 1,199 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    If Tanak goes it would be brilliant move to get Paddon and sack Meeke.
    Would it? It may or may not work, i think it's a bit strong to say it would be a 'brilliant move'

    Meeke still has more points than Latvala despite Catalunya too.

    Mikkelsen I would quite like to see in the Toyota. If they really are losing Tanak I think they will need one new driver for next year in addition to Rovanpera. If they can't get Ogier or Neuville then Mikkelsen would be a good choice.

  6. Likes: er88 (29th October 2019),the sniper (29th October 2019),WRC1 (29th October 2019)
  7. #685
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    J y v ä s k y l ä
    Posts
    3,858
    Like
    18,465
    Liked 2,195 Times in 1,078 Posts
    and Marcus Grönholm has given his opinion:

    https://www.is.fi/ralli/art-2000006289675.html?ref=rss
    (in Finnish so ...)
    "quattro best 4wd rallycar ever"

  8. #686
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    68
    Like
    36
    Liked 45 Times in 21 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by COD View Post
    Why keep Latvala and Meeke, when you have Breen and Mikkelsen available? I wouldn’t keep both of then at least as there are options available. Also Paddon as an outside bet
    Because most of these free agents were available last year when they had to fill Lappi's spot. Mäkinen said just before the Catalunya rally he would prefer to continue with the same trio. Unless they really do snag Ogier (according to Belgian publication Rtbf Ogier isn't ruling it out) I don't see them changing the lineup much as Mäkinen clearly values Meeke and Latvala over the other drivers on the market. At least M-Sport, Hyundai and Citroen keep Paddon, Breen and Ostberg on the sidelines. Toyota has done no such thing.

  9. Likes: er88 (29th October 2019)
  10. #687
    Senior Member er88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,236
    Like
    2,598
    Liked 2,275 Times in 1,069 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Rallyper View Post
    If Tanak goes it would be brilliant move to get Paddon and sack Meeke. Latvala still an assett for Toyota.

    And why not Mikkelsen as well or Evans. Kalle probably doing only a few rounds.
    Kalle isn't only doing a few rounds, he's doing a full season in the Yaris.

    Sounds like Latvala is more at risk than Meeke by all accounts, he's had a 3yr spell with the team now and has gone backwards. He has had the same problems for the last two years - starts the first half of the year terribly and his confidence gets shattered when his team mates are generally faster than him. He also gets his setups wrong (or doesnt have a good feeling) more than his team mates, which is a reason Makinen tears his hair out.

    However Tanak leaving could easily see Latvala kept on now. Either way I hope he can remain in the WRC in some form regardless, and it's hard to say for sure that any other driver currently outside the top class like Breen/Paddon/Ostberg etc, are definitely better than Jari and Kris anyway.

  11. Likes: RS (29th October 2019)
  12. #688
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,801
    Like
    337
    Liked 3,791 Times in 1,979 Posts
    Running Rovanpera full season is only a good idea if he is in 4th/non-nominated car. Here I completely agree with C.Clark, there is no point in putting any pressure on him on having to finish rallies.

    ...it's hard to say for sure that any other driver currently outside the top class like Breen/Paddon/Ostberg etc, are definitely better than Jari and Kris anyway.
    This is an important separation, Evans and Mikkelsen are as good or better choice than Latvala/Meeke for team points. A look on the standings with them ahead with 3 less rallies is all that is needed.

    Østberg/Been/Paddon in about that order are not clearly better than Latvala/Meeke and are a level below Evans/Mikkelsen as things stand right now. Paddon can increase his status massively in Australia though and has a perfect road position to do it.
    Last edited by mknight; 29th October 2019 at 16:12.

  13. Likes: Entertainer (29th October 2019),jparker (31st October 2019),RS (29th October 2019)
  14. #689
    Senior Member er88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,236
    Like
    2,598
    Liked 2,275 Times in 1,069 Posts
    I dont know the extra costs involved with running a 4th car instead of just 3, but if Toyota aren't going to be paying a huge salary to keep Tanak/pay Ogier, they could have extra budget needed to run 4cars and sign someone like Mikkelsen (who will be happy to drive for a relatively small salary in WRC terms vs paying for a seat at Msport - which seems to be his only other option).

    Latvala, Meeke and Mikkelsen would be a nice 3 car team given what's left available, and then you can run Kalle for a full season pressure free in a 4th car. Don't know what Tanak will have been demanding, but I'm sure it'll have been anywhere between €5-10m a year, which is a lot.

  15. Likes: KKS (3rd November 2019)
  16. #690
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Posts
    68
    Like
    36
    Liked 45 Times in 21 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    Paddon can increase his status massively in Australia though and has a perfect road position to do it.
    I highly doubt Paddon will start in Australia for this reason: https://www.hyundai.co.nz/community/hayden-paddon

    From what I understand he has a lot of business ties to Hyundai, to the point where even his Ford WRC has a banner "HNZ". I would be very suprised if Hyundai allows him to steal the manufacturer's points needed for the title.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •