Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 105 of 105
  1. #101
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,384
    Like
    142
    Liked 92 Times in 72 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by journeyman racer View Post
    This is a scenario I could see Ferrari taking to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
    Does CAS even have jurisdiction vis á vis Formula One apart from doping infrigements? I have never heard of a single F1-related case being decided by CAS, which leads me to believe that there is no arbitration agreement with regard to the FIA.
    Oct. 31, 1999 - one of the blackest days in motorsports.

  2. #102
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,371
    Like
    53
    Liked 330 Times in 249 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by gm99 View Post
    Does CAS even have jurisdiction vis á vis Formula One apart from doping infrigements? I have never heard of a single F1-related case being decided by CAS, which leads me to believe that there is no arbitration agreement with regard to the FIA.
    CAS, afaik, have no jurisdiction over F1 matters. Even Giedo van der Garde had to take his case through the Supreme Court of Victoria to get what he wanted in 2014. I still cannot believe Monisha Kaltenborn kept her job after such a colossal screw up she made that time.

  3. Likes: gm99 (21st June 2019)
  4. #103
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    7,631
    Like
    39
    Liked 375 Times in 304 Posts
    I know this is over , but here's one last point I'd like to make .

    Had Ferrari gotten this Canadian result overturned , the general consensus seems to be that Mercedes would have the right to feel aggrieved because they turned down Lewis's engine , instead of having him fight to get past Seb for the win .

    So , rather than thrashing the motor , presumably on the most extreme settings , Lewis was now able to turn it down , certainly extending it's life .
    With 3 engines per car per year , that could have a major effect on the championship .

  5. #104
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    1,385
    Like
    0
    Liked 309 Times in 250 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Bagwan View Post
    I know this is over , but here's one last point I'd like to make .

    Had Ferrari gotten this Canadian result overturned , the general consensus seems to be that Mercedes would have the right to feel aggrieved because they turned down Lewis's engine , instead of having him fight to get past Seb for the win .

    So , rather than thrashing the motor , presumably on the most extreme settings , Lewis was now able to turn it down , certainly extending it's life .
    With 3 engines per car per year , that could have a major effect on the championship .
    I think Mercedes would rather take the win over the promise of engine life. Bird in hand if you get my drift.
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

  6. #105
    Senior Member journeyman racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    973
    Like
    236
    Liked 116 Times in 87 Posts
    Alright. CAS doesn't have jurisdiction on F1. But I can see them possibly doing something about the result. What, idk.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •