Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    1,241
    Like
    0
    Liked 268 Times in 214 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by denkimi View Post
    Had hamilton driven the redbull in 2010-2013 instead of vettel, he might have been 9 times champion.

    And had vettel switched to mercedes in 2014 he might have been 10 times world champion.

    Its al about luck and being in the right car at the right time.
    It is not as simple as that i don't think. Vettel has been in a marginally faster car the last two seasons and has not increased his title tally. There is more to it than a faster car.
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    To the right of the left
    Posts
    3,677
    Like
    3
    Liked 105 Times in 87 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitrodaze View Post
    It is not as simple as that i don't think. Vettel has been in a marginally faster car the last two seasons and has not increased his title tally. There is more to it than a faster car.
    True, but a faster car has a whole lot to do with it.
    "Old roats am jake mit goats."
    -- Smokey Stover

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    573
    Like
    0
    Liked 333 Times in 167 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Nitrodaze View Post
    It is not as simple as that i don't think. Vettel has been in a marginally faster car the last two seasons and has not increased his title tally. There is more to it than a faster car.
    I don't believe the ferrari is really faster than the mercedes over the course of a whole year. Hamilton has twice the amount of wins and poles this year than vettel, and vettel is still way ahead of raikkonen.
    So either vettel has become slow recently, or the mercedes still had the edge on the majority of the races.

  4. Likes: journeyman racer (20th November 2018)
  5. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    1,241
    Like
    0
    Liked 268 Times in 214 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Starter View Post
    True, but a faster car has a whole lot to do with it.
    If that was the case, Vettel should have won the last two drivers title. But a fast car really helps, not necessarily faster. Which is why Redbull have won four races this season.
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

  6. #15
    Senior Member journeyman racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    890
    Like
    226
    Liked 112 Times in 83 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by denkimi View Post
    I don't believe the ferrari is really faster than the mercedes over the course of a whole year. Hamilton has twice the amount of wins and poles this year than vettel, and vettel is still way ahead of raikkonen.
    So either vettel has become slow recently, or the mercedes still had the edge on the majority of the races.
    You're bang on. But people with their Hamilton glasses on...

  7. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,475
    Like
    60
    Liked 135 Times in 106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by journeyman racer View Post
    zako obviously can't put performances in context.
    I absolutely CAN do that. Note the core of my argument. Should I actually repeat it?

    1. Schumacher has been involved in a number of truly despicable cheating incidents, including championship-deciding collisions in 1994 and 1997. He obviously went along with the banned traction control system in 1994.

    2. His team was caught red-handed cheating in 1994. The only reason Benetton was not disqualified in 1994 was because the F1 community was already shocked by the death of Ayerton Senna, and everyone wanted to forget that horrible season. So the team was slapped with only a symbolic fine, and Schumacher was banned from a couple of races.

    3. In 2000-2004, he was paired with Barrichello at Ferrari, the team with the fastest car. Barrichello raced though the 1990s before coming to Ferrari and hasn't impressed anyone. Schumacher basically run unopposed in 2000-2004, while Hamilton each season at Mercedes had to fight with Rosberg or Vettel.

    4. Schumacher made a horrible return in 2010-2012, couldn't even beat Rosberg. We have seen many times drivers take time off and return in a great form (for example Prost in 1993 or Raikkonen in 2012). Schumacher is not on that list.
    Last edited by zako85; 20th November 2018 at 12:51.

  8. Likes: journeyman racer (21st November 2018)
  9. #17
    Senior Member journeyman racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    890
    Like
    226
    Liked 112 Times in 83 Posts
    I don't agree with everything, but I'll pay that.

    Schumacher from 2000-04 wasn't entirely as straightforward as you made it seem. 2000 was a closer title race than what we've seen in 2017-18. It wasn't just Hakkinen, even Coulthard had a great season and was in the thick of it til the last few races.

    2001. Coulthard was good at the start of year (Had a great win in Brazil). But yeah, this was the start of the Ferrari domination.

    2003 had a good title race with Raikkonen and Montoya, albeit artificially due the qualifying format and points allocation. Otherwise Ferrari would've comprehensively dominated that year as well.

    I'm not sure of the criticism of Barrichello? By then, Ferrari were well invested in Schumacher. Not even Hamilton was going to disrupt the team dynamics. Not much Barrichello could do. He was overdue for a top ride and had to take what he could get.

  10. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    2,432
    Like
    71
    Liked 111 Times in 70 Posts
    The question should probably be... if you were a team boss.. who would you choose between Hamilton and Schumacher in their prime?

    No disrespect to either but as good as Schumacher was and as much as I dislike Hamilton... I think I'd still choose Hamilton.

  11. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Gran Canaria
    Posts
    1,434
    Like
    257
    Liked 165 Times in 122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Zico View Post
    The question should probably be... if you were a team boss.. who would you choose between Hamilton and Schumacher in their prime?

    No disrespect to either but as good as Schumacher was and as much as I dislike Hamilton... I think I'd still choose Hamilton.
    That's actually a very hard thing to say. I believe that Hamilton is pretty much unbeatable when he's at his best, but he still has off days every now and then. Schumacher, on the other hand, was an extremely hard worker and massively consistent. I think the Shoe was the safest pick, but enough has been said on how difficult it is to compare both.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •