Results 1,311 to 1,320 of 1586
Thread: Wrc+
-
23rd January 2019, 19:52 #1311Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2018
- Posts
- 535
- Like
- 140
- Liked 273 Times in 152 Posts
So they can broadcast it to a potentially new audience and then advertise WRC+ whilst it’s on, in the hope of attracting new subscribers.
Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC
- Likes: AndyRAC (23rd January 2019)
-
23rd January 2019, 22:13 #1312Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 72
- Like
- 11
- Liked 84 Times in 34 Posts
Don't think it would hurt to put it on WRC+ and not force "loyal customers" to watch it from crappy facebook.
-
24th January 2019, 00:14 #1313Senior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Kyiv
- Posts
- 4,546
- Like
- 1,757
- Liked 1,148 Times in 672 Posts
They do that in late 2018 aswell. Pre-build rally show on facebook. It quite useful, it tell 'we are here and this a rally week. c'mon come with us and subscribe wrc+'
-
24th January 2019, 05:48 #1314Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Location
- Finland
- Posts
- 834
- Like
- 61
- Liked 121 Times in 69 Posts
Why NOT broadcast it on Fb and WRC+?!!
Sääli on sairautta! ;)
-
24th January 2019, 08:22 #1315Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2013
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 1,437
- Like
- 1,230
- Liked 870 Times in 421 Posts
It's ridiculous. Put it live on Facebook and YouTube for everyone who doesn't have AllLive, but put it on AllLive/WRC+ for us that have paid for it too. Originally Posted by HarriK
At least if it's on YouTube it's much easier for everyone to watch. Facebook can be more difficult for those who don't have it, are at work, can only watch on their phone etc etc.
- Likes: b3637853 (24th January 2019)
-
24th January 2019, 08:29 #1316Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2018
- Posts
- 535
- Like
- 140
- Liked 273 Times in 152 Posts
No idea, but there will be a reason for it. It may just be to suit them, so they can reach a new audience, it may be contractual and therefore possibly cheaper for them to use the FB platform, than through the WRC website, or possibly even because it’s a very last minute decision to actually broadcast it and therefore it won’t get the same level of production that a live stage etc. would. Originally Posted by HarriK
-
24th January 2019, 09:19 #1317Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 90
- Like
- 27
- Liked 50 Times in 22 Posts
One reason could be that they are just purely trying to test the socialmedia side of WRC broadcasting, how active commenting there will be on FB chatbox, how many likes, sharing, etc. It is probably part of WRC's KPI reporting for WRC sponsors.
-
24th January 2019, 09:32 #1318Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2017
- Posts
- 72
- Like
- 11
- Liked 84 Times in 34 Posts
After all it's also in WRC+. Buffering a lot.
*Buffering stopped after Ogier.Last edited by lnvs; 24th January 2019 at 09:37.
-
24th January 2019, 09:37 #1319Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 472
- Like
- 53
- Liked 434 Times in 192 Posts
Yeah proper delay on WRC+ compared to facebook stream...
-
24th January 2019, 09:44 #1320Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Posts
- 478
- Like
- 90
- Liked 297 Times in 145 Posts
"Proper delay"... its maybe one second.
And having much better consistent best quality on wr+ call live compared to facebookLast edited by tc10a; 24th January 2019 at 09:47.
Reply With Quote
Many people said before Sweden entries that Loeb doesn´t like it / won´t drive it... He did. I expect him to drive Finland also. Nothing he said before his Hyundai deal can´t be counted. ...
Hyundai WRT