Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    Senior Member steveaki13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,568
    Like
    695
    Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
    That I believe is the answer Whyzars
    I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy

  2. #12
    Senior Member janneppi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    5,502
    Like
    2
    Liked 50 Times in 32 Posts
    The problem with just raising the minimum weight is that teams would still pressure drives to be skinny and place the ballast where it would help the most. IMO a more sensible option would be to have a minimum weight for driver + seat, maybe 80-100kg combined and seat ballast allowed only on the back area.
    C'est la vie ja taksi tuo.

  3. #13
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janneppi View Post
    The problem with just raising the minimum weight is that teams would still pressure drives to be skinny and place the ballast where it would help the most. IMO a more sensible option would be to have a minimum weight for driver + seat, maybe 80-100kg combined and seat ballast allowed only on the back area.
    a very sensible solution
    you can't argue with results.

  4. #14
    Senior Member journeyman racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,077
    Like
    256
    Liked 146 Times in 113 Posts
    All the F1 engineers will be furious if janneppi joins the FIA technical committee.

    edit: That idea is so good, I'm disappointed I didn't think of it myself.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    South East England
    Posts
    1,490
    Like
    232
    Liked 169 Times in 131 Posts
    So, do we think the weight issue is a fanciful excuse, or is it really so bad that 10kg is losing 0.3sec or whatever per lap, there and then?

    If so, it seems terribly unfair doesn't it?
    SPAM - Going off topic to give you the deals you don't want.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    131
    Like
    9
    Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
    Drivers bitch and moan.

    Ideal weight is low down so COG is less. I think there is a minimun total weight so heavier drivers will always be disadvantage.

    Also, drivers dont make or veto rules. Silly

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    131
    Like
    9
    Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
    Plus its up to designers to make car as light as possible. Chapman v Enzo all over again

  8. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    4
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Let’s throw this weight hat into the ring for the Red Bull differences. Daniel is 1.8m (5’10”) tall and weighs 68kg (149.9 lbs) where Seb is 1.76m (5’9”) tall and weighs 58kg (127.8 lbs). Seb and Dan are about the same height, but Dan outweighs Seb by more than a stone. I believe the extra 20 lbs that Dan is carrying is actually giving him an edge. According to the chart at the Gym, Seb is underweight (even on the women’s scale) and Dan is just under average for his height. Just a thought.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •