Results 41 to 50 of 53
Thread: 10 grand? Seriously???!!!
-
8th April 2014, 12:50 #41
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,414
- Like
- 488
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Sorry , we know you won , but you weren't loud enough , so you're disqualified .
-
8th April 2014, 14:45 #42
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Kent, near Brands Hatch
- Posts
- 6,539
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
-
8th April 2014, 15:18 #43
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- San Diego, Ca
- Posts
- 15,377
- Like
- 1,117
- Liked 644 Times in 509 Posts
Not a big fan of Vettel, but I must say that from outward appearances he is handling the major issues with the PU without an abundance of whining....lately.
May the forza be with you
-
8th April 2014, 16:10 #44
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,127
- Like
- 638
- Liked 669 Times in 467 Posts
I'm more than happy with the new engine notes. I like being able to hear the tires and the wear planks bottoming on occasion. It's nothing like the ear bleeding note that the V8 cars made, but to go to lengths to try to change the exhaust sound is rather crazy IMO. If it's about tech and promoting tech as F1 has always done, then it's an example that big power doesn't have to be made with big decibels.
I'm sure that live the cars are far from quiet, but I don't think people really have a proper perspective of just how crazy loud the V8 cars were.
-
8th April 2014, 18:11 #45
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Posts
- 3,186
- Like
- 1
- Liked 152 Times in 123 Posts
The engines don't sound that great, but the racing has been so fierce that it doesn't matter to me. these engines are the sound of the future so we'de better get used to them. Whether we like it or not, the sport is bent on a "green" footprint, and eliminating the noise pollution (regardless of how much we love that kind of pollution) is simply going be part of the plan.
It's the only way that such a gleefully wasteful sport can survive in today's insane political environment.
-
8th April 2014, 19:14 #46
Eh?
Sgt Bilko- Yes of course F1 does need to road relevant... but if you actually bothered to read my original reply to Phillip Bain before trying to make me look a Bearded tit you will see that I was only suggesting that there needs to be a better balance because a large fan base IS extremely important, something so obvious that it should go without saying.
Almost everyone I know with even the remotest interest in F1 has commented on how dull they sound this year, you can't afford to ignore that.
F1 is not the best test bed/proving ground for the development and evolution of new innovative green technologies with its extremely tight, fixed regulations. F1 just needs to show that it is doing something towards being environmentally friendly without going OTT on the green side to the extent that the 'show' is adversely affected.
Me? Yeah, being a TV race watcher I much preferred the howl of the V8's but wow!... what great wheel to wheel racing we enjoyed last weekend and unless Mercedes decide to put a stop to it, we could be in for a real treat this year.Last edited by Zico; 8th April 2014 at 19:58.
The emergence of the new 'Rainmaster' - Mad Max at Interlagos 2016!
-
9th April 2014, 03:32 #47
-
9th April 2014, 03:52 #48
I know what you're saying but I don't see the DRS as any sort of brilliance. For me, we are in the bad old days.
With the new engines and difficult rear ends of today's cars, selective TC on specific corners could achieve the same as the DRS but in a different form.
Rather than passes at the end of a straight that are not able to be defended, TC at select corners could see a whole slew of new elements introduced to the races.
Different lines for following cars to avoid rear ending the car in front for one.
When the beneficial effect of TC becomes equalised then we may see wheel to wheel races down the straight finishing at the end. Straight line speed becomes more important.
As long as there is the DRS then I don't believe any option can be seen as unsuitable.
-
9th April 2014, 09:28 #49
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Kent, near Brands Hatch
- Posts
- 6,539
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Bearded tit? I had you more as a Dartford Warbler.
PS - I wasn't aiming my post entirely at you - and it wasn't intended to be personal. Just that I think in the current climate, road relevance over waste and excess is much more important that guaranteeing dentists income by having your fillings knocked out by the noise!Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.
-
9th April 2014, 15:14 #50
- Join Date
- Jun 2001
- Location
- Cowtown, Canada
- Posts
- 13,789
- Like
- 25
- Liked 82 Times in 63 Posts
As has been already mentioned, unless attending a live event (which is a fraction of the global audience), the sounds of the sport are only as good the microphone pickups at the track, along with the quality of the viewer’s home audio equipment.
As someone who has not attended a live event in years, the sound of today’s cars makes little impact on my interest (or disinterest to be precise) in viewing a televised race .“If everything's under control, you're going too slow.” Mario Andretti
1 Neuville 2 Evans 3 Ogier 4 Tanak 5 Fourmaux 6 Katsuta 7 Mikkelsen 8 Rossel TWRC
WRC Pickems 2024 - R4 RALLY CROATIA