Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1
    Senior Member MrJan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    8,093
    Like
    28
    Liked 335 Times in 204 Posts

    Open roads proposal

    Very, very important for UK motorsport fans (but would be nice if those abroad could weigh in too), the government consultation to allow the closure of roads for purposes of motorsport to come under the jurisdiction of local authorities. This would mean that it would be considerably easier to hold events on public roads, which would really open up the current issue we have with disappearing venues.

    Therefore I urge you to read the attached and e-mail your comments on to the committee (or use the MSA guideline responses) to add weight behind this

    http://www.msauk.org/uploadedfiles/news ... dRoads.pdf
    You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.

  2. #2
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Good stuff. As I understand it, the closure of roads isn't really an issue; my local council can close a road for a cycling event, for example. But just because the road is closed doesn't suspend the Road Traffic Act so it's still subject to speed limits, construction rules etc, and it's this which requires an act of parliament to suspend.
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    To the right of the left
    Posts
    3,746
    Like
    3
    Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark
    Good stuff. As I understand it, the closure of roads isn't really an issue; my local council can close a road for a cycling event, for example. But just because the road is closed doesn't suspend the Road Traffic Act so it's still subject to speed limits, construction rules etc, and it's this which requires an act of parliament to suspend.
    Speaking from this side of the Atlantic, the use of local roads should be at the discretion of local officials. Here that would mean local roads by the county/city it's in; state routes by the state and interstate highways by the feds. That doesn't mean that is the way it is though.
    "Old roats am jake mit goats."
    -- Smokey Stover

  4. #4
    Senior Member MrJan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    8,093
    Like
    28
    Liked 335 Times in 204 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark
    Good stuff. As I understand it, the closure of roads isn't really an issue; my local council can close a road for a cycling event, for example. But just because the road is closed doesn't suspend the Road Traffic Act so it's still subject to speed limits, construction rules etc, and it's this which requires an act of parliament to suspend.
    Which is what makes the whole thing even more ridiculous! If the road is closed then speed limits needn't be an issue (especially considering the insurance and H&S hoops that most events already have to jump through), so effectively the whole thing ought to be a moot point.

    The irony is that, having been involved in organising an event, the various proof of insurances and risk assessments that are required by local authorities are considerable more than the ones of a private landowner.
    You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Gregor-y's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,041
    Like
    281
    Liked 140 Times in 81 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Starter
    Speaking from this side of the Atlantic, the use of local roads should be at the discretion of local officials. Here that would mean local roads by the county/city it's in; state routes by the state and interstate highways by the feds. That doesn't mean that is the way it is though.
    It is with the exception of federal land or state parks, where national or state laws can apply and will be at the discretion of the park director. County Sheriffs also can play a large role, though they usually will work with the desires of the local chamber of commerce. A bigger issue these days is with requirements from insurance companies dictating maximum average speeds on rally stages.

    At 100 Acre Wood this year there was a stage that had two chicanes on it to reduce the average speed to 80 mph. After the first few cars exceed this speed two more chicanes were added for the next run - much to the annoyance of codrivers and the control staff that had to notify them, plus it was dark by then - and one car still managed to beat the maximum average.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    To the right of the left
    Posts
    3,746
    Like
    3
    Liked 141 Times in 111 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Gregor-y
    Quote Originally Posted by Starter
    Speaking from this side of the Atlantic, the use of local roads should be at the discretion of local officials. Here that would mean local roads by the county/city it's in; state routes by the state and interstate highways by the feds. That doesn't mean that is the way it is though.
    It is with the exception of federal land or state parks, where national or state laws can apply and will be at the discretion of the park director. County Sheriffs also can play a large role, though they usually will work with the desires of the local chamber of commerce. A bigger issue these days is with requirements from insurance companies dictating maximum average speeds on rally stages.

    At 100 Acre Wood this year there was a stage that had two chicanes on it to reduce the average speed to 80 mph. After the first few cars exceed this speed two more chicanes were added for the next run - much to the annoyance of codrivers and the control staff that had to notify them, plus it was dark by then - and one car still managed to beat the maximum average.
    That's the fault of the way our courts work. People will sue over anything. This is one place where our Brit friends have it right. Want to sue someone? Go ahead, loser pays. Cuts way down on the frivolous and "sue because its cheaper for them to pay" lawsuits.
    "Old roats am jake mit goats."
    -- Smokey Stover

  7. #7
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by MrJan
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark
    Good stuff. As I understand it, the closure of roads isn't really an issue; my local council can close a road for a cycling event, for example. But just because the road is closed doesn't suspend the Road Traffic Act so it's still subject to speed limits, construction rules etc, and it's this which requires an act of parliament to suspend.
    Which is what makes the whole thing even more ridiculous! If the road is closed then speed limits needn't be an issue (especially considering the insurance and H&S hoops that most events already have to jump through), so effectively the whole thing ought to be a moot point.

    The irony is that, having been involved in organising an event, the various proof of insurances and risk assessments that are required by local authorities are considerable more than the ones of a private landowner.
    Much of the time the road closures aren't 100% effective anyway. There's a couple of cycling events in Durham that I do where a small amount of roads are closed (mostly the steep climbs) but there's always at least one car that ignores the closure signs, the person standing at the sign trying to stop them and all the cyclists on the route and drives up anyway. Last year one rider got hit head on my a car who had ignored the signs (he was ok, his bike wasn't)
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  8. #8
    Senior Member MrJan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    8,093
    Like
    28
    Liked 335 Times in 204 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark
    Much of the time the road closures aren't 100% effective anyway. There's a couple of cycling events in Durham that I do where a small amount of roads are closed (mostly the steep climbs) but there's always at least one car that ignores the closure signs, the person standing at the sign trying to stop them and all the cyclists on the route and drives up anyway. Last year one rider got hit head on my a car who had ignored the signs (he was ok, his bike wasn't)
    Doesn't even have to be public roads for that to happen. Saw a similar case but the reverse of yours, a cyclist on a car event.

    Was at the Tempest Rally a couple of years ago, a gravel event run around Aldershot. We were on a stage at a fairly quick straight and a woman, probably in her 50s, came along on her pushbike merrily pedalling away. Quite a few of us shouted across to her that she was on a live rally stage but she just shook her head and carried on pedalling and looking annoyed. Cue MK2 Escort at complete flat chat having to hammer on the anchors, no doubt s***ing himself. I don't think it occurred to her tha:

    a) she may do the same cycle ride every week but she had also passed a number of 'motorsport is dangerous' and 'you are approaching a live rally stage' signs.
    b) It was a properly organised event, on a non public gravel road, not just some idiots with their baseball caps on back to front
    c) She wasn't just endangering her own life but the lives of the crews and spectators
    You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Exmuhle.....
    Posts
    5,284
    Like
    2,602
    Liked 1,244 Times in 676 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    From memory - when I went to the Jim Clark in 1999, I remember being told that once the 'road closer' car had been through, it was illegal to set foot once the road, and you were actually breaking the law. I presume this is still the case?


    However, the possibility of having closed road Motorsport is something to hopefully look forward to. It been ridiculous that we couldn't - yet virtually every other country in Europe did. Look at the European Hillclimbs, the Ypres/ Zlin Rallies..... Providing it's done correctly, it could be fantastic.

    If you're a Motorsport fan - and being on this forum would suggest you are - then get writing.

    Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???

  10. #10
    Senior Member MrJan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    8,093
    Like
    28
    Liked 335 Times in 204 Posts

    Re: Open roads proposal

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyRAC
    However, the possibility of having closed road Motorsport is something to hopefully look forward to. It been ridiculous that we couldn't - yet virtually every other country in Europe did. Look at the European Hillclimbs, the Ypres/ Zlin Rallies..... Providing it's done correctly, it could be fantastic.
    True story. Even Switzerland, where famously they don't allow 'races' they have closed road time trials such as rallying & hillclimbs. In fact some of the Swiss hillclimbs are absolutely fantastic and feature some truly brilliant cars.

    This is one of my favourite videos on Youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBLIHAsknRI
    You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •