Results 11 to 20 of 54
-
3rd June 2013, 09:46 #11
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,821
- Like
- 2,088
- Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
The Ferrari situation is completely different; old car, not run by the race team, and not with the race drivers.
Do Pirelli not still have their own test driver and car for track testing?
-
3rd June 2013, 10:18 #12
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 10,345
- Like
- 149
- Liked 192 Times in 142 Posts
Originally Posted by Koz
I don't think anybody is 'dragging' Ferrari into anything. It would be unfair not to at least discuss what these teams have done and move forward with the type of outcome where every team understands the rules surrounding tyre testing..
-
3rd June 2013, 10:42 #13
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Location
- Oradea
- Posts
- 2,637
- Like
- 75
- Liked 137 Times in 110 Posts
perhaps Mercedes deserves a bit more than a slap on the wrist... like a punch in the face.
-
3rd June 2013, 11:26 #14
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Kent, near Brands Hatch
- Posts
- 6,539
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
One would assume that, in order to properly compare tyres against each other, Pirelli mandated to Mercedes and Forti Course, that the car should remain unchanged in setup/development parts across the entire test.
This being the case, other than reliability and maybe driver fitness, what could Mercedes or Ferrari learn?
Should Michelin be shoehorned in, the rules around tyre testing would have to be changed simply to get the tyres race ready. Should this happen, and Pirelli are pushed out, I suspect there would be a rather significant lawsuit from Pirelli in respect of, at the very least, restrictive practice.
For that reason alone, I find it hard to believe that Pirelli wont be in F1 in 2014, and no team will be punished in respect to Pirelli tyre testing.
No, I see this as dirty laundry - FIA want more money, and are trying to scupper the fact (potentially) that FOM have agreed a deal with Pirelli - Bernard is saying "screw you"Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.
-
3rd June 2013, 11:49 #15
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 10,345
- Like
- 149
- Liked 192 Times in 142 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Ben.
-
3rd June 2013, 14:39 #16
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,821
- Like
- 2,088
- Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
Originally Posted by SGWilko
-
3rd June 2013, 14:53 #17
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Terra Germanica
- Posts
- 2,948
- Like
- 17
- Liked 146 Times in 122 Posts
I think he meant to refer to Corse Clienti
как могу я знать что я думаю, пока не слушал что я говорю
-
3rd June 2013, 14:57 #18
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Kent, near Brands Hatch
- Posts
- 6,539
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
EDIT ^^ what he said.
Originally Posted by RSOpinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.
-
3rd June 2013, 15:00 #19
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,132
- Like
- 645
- Liked 673 Times in 470 Posts
Pirelli have stated that the tests were "blind tests". The teams themselves don't have access to the information or know what Pirelli were testing. Stefano Domenicali has made it clear the protest from Ferrari was for clarification over testing specifics, and wants Ferrari to be allowed testing in newer cars if it is legal.
I've seen nothing providing any evidence that there were attempts to keep the testing secret. I think it's another example of the FIA not having clearly defined policies and then pointing the finger at someone else. I personally don't think either team gained advantage from the testing.
-
3rd June 2013, 15:48 #20
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Terra Germanica
- Posts
- 2,948
- Like
- 17
- Liked 146 Times in 122 Posts
Originally Posted by airshifterкак могу я знать что я думаю, пока не слушал что я говорю
F1 Driver Nico Hulkenberg Signs New Contract With Kick Sauber, To Leave Haas After 2024 Season. This will mark Nico‘s return to the team, which he previously drove for back in 2013. Sauber will then...
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...