Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 58
  1. #11
    Senior Member steveaki13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,568
    Like
    695
    Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
    Anyway.

    I think FIA need to think hard about where F1 will be in 10-20-50 years

    If it goes "The Show" route it may suffer in 10 years

    If it goes "The Sport" Route F1 will continue after us.
    I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by henners88
    The FIA need to admit they got it wrong this season. Pirelli are getting the bad reputation and I don't think that is entirely fair.
    I'm not sure Jean Todt does that. Come to think of it, I'm starting to be unsure whether he does anything.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    Question. Can modern F1 truly be entertaining (excluding wet races) without artificial elements like deliberately crap tyres and DRS? I have my doubts.

  4. #14
    Senior Member steveaki13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,568
    Like
    695
    Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
    Sad as it is. Thats a key question.

    However if the Question was, Could modern F1 being an entertaining sport without crap tyres and DRS? Then my answer would be yes.

    If those in control were willing to take some serious action to change the sport and the regulations to limit aero effects and ease restrictions.

    However until F1 is willing to have the biggest reg changes for a while, nothing will change
    I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy

  5. #15
    Senior Member steveaki13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,568
    Like
    695
    Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steveaki13
    Who would have thought I would make 3000 before Henners.
    Doh

    Now noticed Henners is restored to his former post glory.

    Well done Henners back as you belong.
    I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,422
    Like
    101
    Liked 100 Times in 76 Posts
    What we need is to bring back refueling.

  7. #17
    Senior Member Duncan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Oregon, US
    Posts
    290
    Like
    372
    Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
    There's definitely a list of things that just seem completely out of place. I understand what the changes were supposed to bring about, but it just makes the whole thing artificial instead of the "balls to the wall" F1 racing that I remember from way back...

    DRS: please, please get rid of this monstrosity. I just don't see the attraction. What's the point of increasing the number of overtaking maneuvers when we all know that they're fake?

    T{i|y}res: Something has just gone horribly wrong with whatever the plan was here. Get rid of the "must use both compounds" rule and let t{i|y}re manufacturers compete to produce whatever they think will work best. Who knows what they'll be able to come up with?

    Refueling: I understand that there's a significant safety angle here, but it just doesn't seem that unmanageable. Refueling gave the teams much more to play with in terms of strategy, and it seemed to me to be an important element of the whole race-watching experience.

    In general, ugh. Something really has to change here.

  8. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    122
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The sport is far more exciting than 10 years ago and I'm saying that as a Schumacher fan that followed his entire F1 career.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    10,345
    Like
    149
    Liked 192 Times in 142 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steveaki13
    Doh

    Now noticed Henners is restored to his former post glory.

    Well done Henners back as you belong.
    I found them under my bed. They were there all along.
    .

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,583
    Like
    68
    Liked 182 Times in 139 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steveaki13
    The main gripe I have with DRS is its unfair. If 2 drivers battle without DRS one passes the other can defend on an even level except for slipstream, then straight away the 2nd driver can use slipstream to repass or fight back. Now a driver is passed with DRS and thats it. No defense and no chance to fight back until next lap.
    I don't understand this. When a DRS-enabled pass happens, most of the time its at the end of the main straightway, so there is no way the losing driver could possibly slipstream and repass back. I also would like to mention that DRS does not always make passes trivial. There are plenty of examples. Just looks at the last Monaco race. The race track isn't that slow. The cars can still use the highest gear and hit speeds over 170mph, yet passing was so hard. There are many other examples.

    Finally, DRS is not completely unfair. If you're the leading car, you can still fight and defend. For example, by keeping the following car more than a second behind. Let's be honest, if the following car is glued to the rear end the whole time, then it is the faster car, and the only reason it's behind is that the front car is blocking it in some way. Granted, there are race tracks and races where DRS made the overtakes look completely fake, but I don't remember the specific cases they were, but they exist. The system is not perfect, but it works IMHO.

    I do hate the tire situation though. In my opinion there needs to be a tire supplier competition so that the tire supplier is concerned with how to complete the race in the least time possible instead of how to crease an exciting show. Once there is tire competition, the tire supplier will work closely with the leading team and will provide the tire that this team needs to win the race, however few or many pit stops this team needs. Making a tire that forces a pit stop just for the show is just wrong. I could care less about the "excitement" that this causes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •