Results 1 to 10 of 35
Thread: Wor Thread
-
7th March 2013, 11:00 #1
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Tallinn, Estonia
- Posts
- 5,637
- Like
- 0
- Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Wor Thread
Just trying out an idea. On 'Spicing Up the Forum', Airshifter suggested we have a section of the forum which is unmoderated. How about just one thread? We could have a few feuds settled here, and a few banned members voicing their grievances...
Why not?
If you're against the idea though, Mark and moderators, just close/delete this and sorry for the inconvenience!
-
7th March 2013, 11:31 #2
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
- Like
- 647
- Liked 677 Times in 473 Posts
I could be a good or bad thing, depends on how the members handle it. The forum that does it still moderates but with less restrictions. You for instance could get away with calling someone a douche or idiot for supporting brand or team X, but cursing and personal threats were still not tolerated. On that forum it worked OK because after a period you identify the hotheads that will never listen to any opposing view, and few members would bother to engage them.
I don't spend much time in the racing forums other than the F1 section, but a lot of the F1 people are obviously very passionate in their views. It could just as easily spiral out of control and become a nightmare to keep in line.
If you'd like I could PM you and insult you to within a fraction of my "forum life".
-
7th March 2013, 11:38 #3
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Tallinn, Estonia
- Posts
- 5,637
- Like
- 0
- Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by airshifter
I just thought it might be a good idea to concentrate all the negative stuff into one place. There is bound to be some negative stuff, isn't there... Instead of it spoiling other, perfectly good threads.
For instance, we could discuss here how BDunnell and Daniel merged into a 'BDaniel' on the Savile thread...
-
7th March 2013, 11:52 #4
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by EuroTroll
-
7th March 2013, 11:54 #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Tallinn, Estonia
- Posts
- 5,637
- Like
- 0
- Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by BDunnell
-
7th March 2013, 12:03 #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2000
- Location
- Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 38,577
- Like
- 78
- Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by BDunnellPlease 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums
-
7th March 2013, 12:05 #7
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark
-
7th March 2013, 12:07 #8
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Absurdistan
- Posts
- 13,608
- Like
- 214
- Liked 387 Times in 327 Posts
Originally Posted by EuroTroll
-
7th March 2013, 12:19 #9
- Join Date
- Mar 2008
- Posts
- 10,345
- Like
- 149
- Liked 192 Times in 142 Posts
Originally Posted by BDunnell.
-
7th March 2013, 12:23 #10
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by henners88
Tänak got 20 points closer to Evans, but as the main reason was a bad rally for Evans, I would say that Evans lost 20 points to Tänak, not Tänak gained. The point is, if the other one does not...
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...