Results 51 to 60 of 128
-
4th June 2012, 02:48 #51
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by garyshell
-
4th June 2012, 05:40 #52Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Wasn't there an ALMS race there the day before? Did the track break up then? If not, what expectation would Randy have that it would today. Look this was a really bad outcome today, I agree. I just don't see how it falls on Randy's head.
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
4th June 2012, 07:18 #53
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anthony has a point...
I own a couple restaurants.... And even if I'm on vacation and one my cooks over cooks a steak ultimately thats my responsibilitySarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
4th June 2012, 13:49 #54
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by garyshell
He is the boss. If the people who he hired FAILED in the track inspection then he FAILED as a Chief Operating Officer. The Business world is littered with the carcasses of former business leaders who failed to lead.
BTW It was Grand-Am not ALMS and I have heard from some people that yes, parts of the track were coming up on Saturday.
-
4th June 2012, 15:08 #55
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 2,443
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ultimately, the buck stops at Randy - if they did not properly check out the course ahead of time that would be his fault for not insisting it be right and once the situation became bad he should have "lead" to some sort of solution (which he may have done behind the scenes). Basically this is a perfect example of the old adage "PPPPPPP" - proper prior planning prevents pi** poor performance.... and Randy is responsible for proper prior planning...
The real problem here is the series continues to deal from a potion of weakness and as such does not have the power to tell promoters, teams, etc. to "do it right or get lost"... I am fine with racing in Detroit on a less than ideal race course for the sake of Chevy etc. It is not ok for that course to then fall apart (much like the rest of the infrastructure of this country). The promoters should have known better....
But, I agree, Randy has to accept responsibility and deal with this fiasco - not pass the buck......
-
4th June 2012, 16:49 #56
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 2,462
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SarahFanJose Arrambide
Nobody Expects The Spanish Inquisition
Monty Python Flying Circus
-
4th June 2012, 17:14 #57
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Responsibility is greater/trumps fault
Sarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
4th June 2012, 18:03 #58
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Danville, IN
- Posts
- 544
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting reading from passionate people I must say.
The basics of this post was to deal with the owners trying to get rid of Randy. They have no power to do so and only a few have the ear of "The Family".
I think Randy was smart blasting it on twitter and keeping the series in the media's attention. Even the bad track problems at Detroit will keep the media's interest a few more days. Media coverage is good and controversy sells TV time.
I agree with RM, he needs a trusted racing veteran owner to help him. But my advise is to Randy is to watch your back when making that selection. What is Mo Nunn doing these days?
-
4th June 2012, 18:24 #59
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 2,462
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SarahFan
In this case, obviously, you can't fire the one at fault because promoters don't work for the racing leagues, getting rid of the race might not be a solution either, lets be honest, promoters and tracks are not fighting to stage Indy races, but I do want to see him taking every possible measure to avoid something like this if they use this track next year.
His job is not easy, he can't choose and pick, this is not F1 where Ecclestone has to choose between tracks he wants, tracks that are willing to pay him a lot of money, tracks that will improve the F1 brand, and tracks of governments willing to do everything and anything to stage a race, in Indy you try to do the best you can with what you have.Jose Arrambide
Nobody Expects The Spanish Inquisition
Monty Python Flying Circus
-
4th June 2012, 20:35 #60
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Without splitting too many hairs ..
Responsibility always encompasses fault
The other way around not so muchSarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
1 Rovanpera 2 Tanak 3 Sordo 4 Ogier 5 Neuville 6 Evans 7 Fourmaux 8 Solberg Rallyper
WRC PICKEMS 2024 - Round 5 RALLY...