Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 128
  1. #51
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    5,522
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by garyshell
    what part of this fiasco did Randy have direct control of?

    The track conditiion, nope. The tv switch, nope.


    Gary
    Of course he had control of the track conditions. Wasn't there a inspection? If there was then he failed. If there wasn't then he failed.

  2. #52
    Senior Member garyshell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6,411
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by anthonyvop
    Of course he had control of the track conditions. Wasn't there a inspection? If there was then he failed. If there wasn't then he failed.
    So Randy is supposed to be doing these inspections himself? Of course we both know that is not the case. Now, given that, if he is told by the folks who did the inspection that things looked ok, he's not supposed to take their word for it? Yes the buck may stop with him, but it was still not something under his direct control.

    Wasn't there an ALMS race there the day before? Did the track break up then? If not, what expectation would Randy have that it would today. Look this was a really bad outcome today, I agree. I just don't see how it falls on Randy's head.

    Gary
    "If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.

  3. #53
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,772
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Anthony has a point...

    I own a couple restaurants.... And even if I'm on vacation and one my cooks over cooks a steak ultimately thats my responsibility
    Sarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    5,522
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by garyshell
    So Randy is supposed to be doing these inspections himself? Of course we both know that is not the case. Now, given that, if he is told by the folks who did the inspection that things looked ok, he's not supposed to take their word for it? Yes the buck may stop with him, but it was still not something under his direct control.

    Wasn't there an ALMS race there the day before? Did the track break up then? If not, what expectation would Randy have that it would today. Look this was a really bad outcome today, I agree. I just don't see how it falls on Randy's head.

    Gary
    Are you telling me because he is COO Randy has no responsibility of how the series is actually run?

    He is the boss. If the people who he hired FAILED in the track inspection then he FAILED as a Chief Operating Officer. The Business world is littered with the carcasses of former business leaders who failed to lead.

    BTW It was Grand-Am not ALMS and I have heard from some people that yes, parts of the track were coming up on Saturday.

  5. #55
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,443
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Ultimately, the buck stops at Randy - if they did not properly check out the course ahead of time that would be his fault for not insisting it be right and once the situation became bad he should have "lead" to some sort of solution (which he may have done behind the scenes). Basically this is a perfect example of the old adage "PPPPPPP" - proper prior planning prevents pi** poor performance.... and Randy is responsible for proper prior planning...

    The real problem here is the series continues to deal from a potion of weakness and as such does not have the power to tell promoters, teams, etc. to "do it right or get lost"... I am fine with racing in Detroit on a less than ideal race course for the sake of Chevy etc. It is not ok for that course to then fall apart (much like the rest of the infrastructure of this country). The promoters should have known better....

    But, I agree, Randy has to accept responsibility and deal with this fiasco - not pass the buck......

  6. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,462
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SarahFan
    Anthony has a point...

    I own a couple restaurants.... And even if I'm on vacation and one my cooks over cooks a steak ultimately thats my responsibility
    In that example, you are the responsible one but it is not your fault, there is a difference there, it becomes your fault if you don't take actions and it keeps happening again, again, and again.
    Jose Arrambide
    Nobody Expects The Spanish Inquisition
    Monty Python Flying Circus

  7. #57
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,772
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Responsibility is greater/trumps fault
    Sarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!

  8. #58
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Danville, IN
    Posts
    544
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Interesting reading from passionate people I must say.

    The basics of this post was to deal with the owners trying to get rid of Randy. They have no power to do so and only a few have the ear of "The Family".

    I think Randy was smart blasting it on twitter and keeping the series in the media's attention. Even the bad track problems at Detroit will keep the media's interest a few more days. Media coverage is good and controversy sells TV time.

    I agree with RM, he needs a trusted racing veteran owner to help him. But my advise is to Randy is to watch your back when making that selection. What is Mo Nunn doing these days?

  9. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,462
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SarahFan
    Responsibility is greater/trumps fault
    Most certainly, but Anthony's point was that it was his fault, I'm saying that thee is a difference between being the responsible one and the one at fault, you fire the one at fault, not the responsible one, you fire the responsible one only when he or she is uncapable of taking corrective actions.

    In this case, obviously, you can't fire the one at fault because promoters don't work for the racing leagues, getting rid of the race might not be a solution either, lets be honest, promoters and tracks are not fighting to stage Indy races, but I do want to see him taking every possible measure to avoid something like this if they use this track next year.

    His job is not easy, he can't choose and pick, this is not F1 where Ecclestone has to choose between tracks he wants, tracks that are willing to pay him a lot of money, tracks that will improve the F1 brand, and tracks of governments willing to do everything and anything to stage a race, in Indy you try to do the best you can with what you have.
    Jose Arrambide
    Nobody Expects The Spanish Inquisition
    Monty Python Flying Circus

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,772
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Without splitting too many hairs ..

    Responsibility always encompasses fault

    The other way around not so much
    Sarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •