Results 101 to 110 of 128
-
26th July 2012, 22:28 #101Originally Posted by bugeyedgomer
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
26th July 2012, 22:44 #102
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 266
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Indy is all that matters. You don't think you could get 33 entrants?
-
26th July 2012, 22:58 #103Originally Posted by bugeyedgomer
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
27th July 2012, 03:33 #104
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 266
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
IMS doesn't need to be bothered with the grumpy owners. All it has to do to hold a successful Indy 500 is announce the date, sell the tickets and open the gates.
If the owners want to gripe and complain, let them do it amonst themselves on their own dime. Until then, they should just shut up and show up. Or go to NASCAR, which is a lot more flexible and open to owners complaints.
-
27th July 2012, 04:02 #105Originally Posted by bugeyedgomer
Check the calendar. The year is 2012, not 1952, 1962, 1972 or even 1982. IMHO, your scenario would result in the demise of the sport and with it the 500. There is no way that race could stand on its own given the economics of open wheel racing in this time.
Gary"If you think there's a solution, you're part of the problem." --- George Carlin :andrea: R.I.P.
-
27th July 2012, 14:29 #106
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 1,009
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bugeyedgomerKeep it fast, keep it real!!!
-
27th July 2012, 14:36 #107
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 1,009
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bugeyedgomerKeep it fast, keep it real!!!
-
27th July 2012, 14:40 #108
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 2,443
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The days of "schedule it and they will come" are over.... Everyone needs to work together.... That being said - it seems like the team owners need to get over some things.....
I would say this is also an example of the weakness of "socialized" sports - the series has set so many parameters at this point that there is not alot of flexibility to innovate either the racing equipment or the business model.....
-
27th July 2012, 15:27 #109
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Posts
- 8,772
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm with the owners ...
The HG wanted control of the sport and they got it...
Now they have no F'en idea what to do withSarah Fisher..... Team owner of a future Indy500 winning car!
-
27th July 2012, 19:29 #110
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by garyshell
They have created an entitlement team owner class. Of course they don't want more races. Of course They don't want new aero packages. Why should day if they are doing ok with all the subsidies they receive and enough sponsorship to cover 15-16 races but not 20.
Isn't anyone curious how Sarah Fisher an keep on going all this time with little or no sponsorship?
I have said it for years. Open up the rules. I would prefer a series with 12-16 well-funded/Well-run cars than a series of 26 cars where half of the field has no chance and add nothing to the series besides a bigger grid.
I added to eWRC-results according sportity document: https://app-cdn.sportity.com/274a5341-9c48-493e-9f74-ad02d520f4f3/5fbd328b-0b62-497e-9a8d-31111e085d07_Championship%20Points%20PRT%202024.pdf
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...