Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    49
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Thumbs up Leader Circle Program.

    Any comments on the so-called Leader Circle program ? It looks to me that the money allotment selection was made by a bunch of kids. How much influence did Roger and Chip have in this matter ? They are both not very fond of PT and Tags.
    roadking

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,307
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Get your facts straight.

    Quote Originally Posted by hondacom
    Any comments on the so-called Leader Circle program ? It looks to me that the money allotment selection was made by a bunch of kids. How much influence did Roger and Chip have in this matter ? They are both not very fond of PT and Tags.
    If anything, Ganassi was actually discriminated against, as Charlie Kimball finished inside the Top 22 in points last year, yet he isn't in the program. It doesn't have anything to do with drivers, the suggestion that MSR and BHA are left out because someone dislikes PT and Tag (not Tags) is just childish.

    The selection process is very simple: you're in if you are commited to field a full-time car and you've finished in the Top 22 last year. There are two extra spots and they were awarded to Dragon Racing (two full-time cars as a works team) and Ed Carpenter Racing (a full-time car with a sponsor promising a lot of activation).

    As for Shank, maybe he should try acting like Bobby Rahal, Sarah Fisher or Bryan Herta (who aren't in the leaders circle) and work to establish his team as a force to be reckoned with (as in race winners) before making threats and bitching for money without proving anything in IndyCar.
    “It used to be about trying to do something. Now it’s about trying to be someone.”

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,027
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Krogshöj
    If anything, Ganassi was actually discriminated against, as Charlie Kimball finished inside the Top 22 in points last year, yet he isn't in the program. It doesn't have anything to do with drivers, the suggestion that MSR and BHA are left out because someone dislikes PT and Tag (not Tags) is just childish.

    The selection process is very simple: you're in if you are commited to field a full-time car and you've finished in the Top 22 last year. There are two extra spots and they were awarded to Dragon Racing (two full-time cars as a works team) and Ed Carpenter Racing (a full-time car with a sponsor promising a lot of activation).

    As for Shank, maybe he should try acting like Bobby Rahal, Sarah Fisher or Bryan Herta (who aren't in the leaders circle) and work to establish his team as a force to be reckoned with (as in race winners) before making threats and bitching for money without proving anything in IndyCar.
    Good points and I agree. However, with the two chosen having a Penske and a IMS/Tony George connection, I can understand how some would doubt the selections were objective. I doubt it, myself. But Shank shouldn't have any major complaints. He's new to IndyCar and should have to prove himself. I can see why Herta, Rahal and Ganassi would be unhappy with the outcome.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,009
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Penske and TG son. Hmm.... very hard to decide, but for my buck I would pay to see PT race and Ed I will not watch for free .Objective they are not, but they should help PT find a ride because he does have many fans.
    Keep it fast, keep it real!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •