Page 211 of 525 FirstFirst ... 111161201209210211212213221261311 ... LastLast
Results 2,101 to 2,110 of 5242
  1. #2101
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by NickRally View Post
    To illustrate how ridiculous this suggestion is (which is like comparing apples with pairs, by the way, as the F1 engines are turbocharged, while NASCAR ones are naturally aspirated), I will do the calcs for each of the two types of engine using figures significantly skewed in favour of the NASCAR engine, so here it is:

    NASCAR engine:
    - Top power: 660 kW @ 8 000 min-1 (remember figures are intentionally distorted to work in NASCAR’s favour)
    - Engine capacity: 5.85 litres

    F1 engine:
    - Top power: 500 kW @ 12 500 min-1 (remember figures are intentionally distorted to work in NASCAR’s favour)
    - Engine capacity: 1.6 litres

    NASCAR calcs:
    BMEP = (660x120) / (5.85*8000) = 1.69231 MPa

    F1 calcs:
    BMEP = (500x120) / (1.6*12500) = 3.0 MPa

    On my side of the pond, 3 is bigger than 1.69 and I suspect it is the same in the US of A, but as I mentioned comparing these two types of engines is stupid in itself as one is naturally aspirated while the other is heavily turbocharged.

    Also, for comparison purposes and using the official figures, which anybody is free to agree or disagree with, here are the calcs for a current WRC engine:

    BMEP = (280x120) / (1.6*6000) = 3.5 MPa

    Now, before anybody starts shouting how the current WRC engines are more efficient than the F1 engines, if we use numbers that are closer to reality for the strongest F1 engine (currently believed to be the Mercedes), then the BMEP is probably not less than 4.2 MPa.
    Go argue with Racecar Engineering and tell them they're all wrong. And that you know because this is your profession..They do seem equally enamored by both F1 and NASCAR, which defies all imagination to me. What team to you work for?
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  2. #2102
    Senior Member NickRally's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    264
    Like
    523
    Liked 233 Times in 115 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by janvanvurpa View Post
    Go argue with Racecar Engineering and tell them they're all wrong. And that you know because this is your profession..They do seem equally enamored by both F1 and NASCAR, which defies all imagination to me. What team to you work for?
    Apologies, I won’t highjack this thread any more after this post. To answer, I suspect they have compared the old naturally aspirated engines used up until 2013 included, which had perhaps a BMEP of just under 1.6 MPa, while the NASCAR engines topped out at maybe slightly over 1.6 MPa, I guess.

    Once again for comparison’s sake, the highest BMEP naturally aspirated engines that I have come in contact with, were the old F3000 engines used up until 1995 (before the series became one make championship) with the BMEP entering the 1.7 MPa territory.

  3. #2103
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,860
    Like
    3,424
    Liked 9,342 Times in 4,961 Posts
    Ogier speaking today:
    "We’ve made good progress since last year and in this sport you don’t achieve anything alone – it’s always a team effort. All the energy we’ve put into developing the car over the past year is really starting to pay off. We saw it already in Mexico with a good step forward on gravel, and so far I think we’ve improved on asphalt too which is very positive for the future."

  4. Likes: A FONDO (7th April 2018)
  5. #2104
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,290
    Like
    28
    Liked 183 Times in 122 Posts
    I guess WRC cars still use the road car engine blocks - compared to a F1 engine system which probably costs as much as if not more than a whole WRC car.
    Complexity of current F1 engine system guessed at by this writer who gives the reader options as to whether the Honda F1 engine system used in 2017 either did or did not have spark plugs?
    A bit more transparency in F1 might be beneficial for the honda fans(if there are any left)?
    F1 is a high miler fuel economy run compared to Nascar?
    https://www.grandprix247.com/2017/07...engine-so-bad/

  6. #2105
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    22
    Like
    0
    Liked 22 Times in 9 Posts
    As Ari Vatanen said about the t16 'the car was starting to fly' & this is where I think Seb is starting to reach with this Fiesta..... which is lump in your throat stuff for West Cumbria.

  7. #2106
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,503
    Like
    7,826
    Liked 11,149 Times in 4,425 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeakiwi View Post
    I guess WRC cars still use the road car engine blocks - compared to a F1 engine system which probably costs as much as if not more than a whole WRC car.
    No, they don't. If I am not mistaken the only WRC car with stock block since the introduction of 1.6T cars in 2011 was Mini and it was proven to be a wrong decision. Others use specific engines built from scratch.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  8. #2107
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    492
    Like
    177
    Liked 386 Times in 167 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    No, they don't. If I am not mistaken the only WRC car with stock block since the introduction of 1.6T cars in 2011 was Mini and it was proven to be a wrong decision. Others use specific engines built from scratch.
    I think the Fiesta also started with stock block, only later they made a race specific block

  9. #2108
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,342
    Like
    5,442
    Liked 839 Times in 406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AMSS View Post
    I think the Fiesta also started with stock block, only later they made a race specific block
    How much difference does a stock block make compared to a specific one? I'm not very informed on engineering stuff.

  10. #2109
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,087
    Like
    9,911
    Liked 16,087 Times in 6,980 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by steve.mandzij View Post
    How much difference does a stock block make compared to a specific one? I'm not very informed on engineering stuff.
    depents how strong/fragile is the stock block you have for reference.
    specific blocks can be better at heat absorb too(bigger water jackets/channels etc)

  11. Likes: AMSS (7th April 2018),steve.mandzij (7th April 2018)
  12. #2110
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    492
    Like
    177
    Liked 386 Times in 167 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dimviii View Post
    depents how strong/fragile is the stock block you have for reference.
    specific blocks can be better at heat absorb too(bigger water jackets/channels etc)
    Besides these also weight reduction and slight center of gravity advantages can be obtained by custom blocks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •