Results 11 to 20 of 144
-
7th June 2011, 14:11 #11
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason PlatoUseful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
7th June 2011, 14:11 #12
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Alfa Fan
BTW Jason, I'm not suggesting that you don't post because clearly it's a great thing that you DO post on here, merely that it's best you don't take any misguided posts to heart as they are merely opinions and opinions are like buttholes, everyone has them and they stink!Rule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
7th June 2011, 14:12 #13
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave BRule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
7th June 2011, 14:18 #14Originally Posted by DanielYou're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
7th June 2011, 14:21 #15Originally Posted by DanielYou're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
7th June 2011, 14:22 #16Originally Posted by Daniel2nd place in the big quizz challenge!
-
7th June 2011, 14:32 #17
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by barryfullalove
Originally Posted by Alfa FanRule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
7th June 2011, 14:35 #18
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Posts
- 92
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alfa Fan
One of the reasons performance parity was promised was for asset protection, RML have a massive amount of money tied up in perfectly good S2000 engines, infact perfectly good enough to win the 2010 WTCC and 2010 BTCC. It's not a case of could they, should they.
-
7th June 2011, 14:39 #19
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- On the Welsh Riviera
- Posts
- 38,844
- Like
- 2
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason PlatoRule 1 of the forum, always accuse anyone who disagrees with you of bias.I would say that though.
-
7th June 2011, 15:08 #20
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Posts
- 112
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I feel that something like the ACO's concept of a data logger that can be fitted to cars to measure engine (not chassis) performance and return that data to the governing body so they can make running parity adjustments between fuel types would probably be a welcome stepping stone to a solution, however I'd imagine this would be a relatively large investment for TOCA to make when their view is towards eventually phasing out the S2000 equipment.
I agree that if you've been promised all engines types will be competitive with one another, then you should expect your governing body to deliver on the promise. Honda and Chevrolet are both excellent teams, I think its fair to expect that they should be on a level playing field.
While I'm against the WTCC way of offering constant dispensations to ensure everyone is competitive no matter how good their equipment is, I think that here a top team is suffering because the rules disadvantage their equipment from the outset.
It's not over until it's over. Other punctures or issues may come. Yesterday night it also looked very different than now just four stages later.
[WRC] Vodafone Rally de Portugal...