View Poll Results: should a team be allowed to run a car that has no testing during the winter
- Voters
- 49. You may not vote on this poll
Results 21 to 30 of 72
Thread: is Hispania done ?
-
30th March 2011, 01:21 #21
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,127
- Like
- 638
- Liked 669 Times in 467 Posts
Sure they have an opportunity, and it's nobody elses fault if they miss it.
But the costs to try to bring in a new F1 team are already high, and if sponsors see new teams failing on a regular basis it will become harder and harder to attract new teams to the sport.
I really think they should have some provision to allow some additional testing for new teams that do not make the 107% rule. It could be a limited number of times, and limited testing. It just seems to me that it's a huge waste to create a system where someone just outside the door has no way to develop and try to get in, while the cars on track are collecting real data and widening the gap every race.
For all we know HRT or the next team trying to replace them if they fail could be the next Lotus, Williams, Ferrari, or McLaren.
-
30th March 2011, 02:14 #22
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Posts
- 3,778
- Like
- 3
- Liked 50 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by jonny hurlock
The problem is Carabantes. I understand that he is a reluctant owner but he's under the mistaken impression that all you need to do with an F1 team is to buy it. He is unwilling to come to terms with the fact that you have to keep investing money to have any chance of survival let alone success.
Thankfully HRT have TATA sponsorship and good TV revenue money from beating Virgin last season. They are financially able to survive this year but their long term future depends on landing new sponsors or Carabante waking up and realising what he has to do if he isn't going to lose the team and all his investment.
-
30th March 2011, 07:11 #23
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 2,386
- Like
- 0
- Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
the funny or sad part about this is if they had of used the old cars
http://paddocktalk.com/news/html/mod...cle&sid=131438
2010 Australia: Formula One Qualifying Results
Bruno Senna 1:30.526
Karun Chandhok 1:30.613VERSTAPPEN: ‘If I’d let Sainz past, dad would’ve kicked me in the nuts!’
-
30th March 2011, 08:53 #24
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 4,574
- Like
- 0
- Liked 36 Times in 29 Posts
Originally Posted by aki13
Originally Posted by airshifter
If I am not mistaken, HRT would have needed to be 2 seconds quicker to qualify."signature room for rent"
-
30th March 2011, 09:34 #25
- Join Date
- Nov 2000
- Location
- Sofia, Bulgaria
- Posts
- 9,532
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I think that they had to find money and test and that's why the decision of the stewards was correct. It is pointless to be a movable chicane - you are not really "racing" with other people.
Formula 1
-
30th March 2011, 11:21 #26
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Posts
- 6,127
- Like
- 638
- Liked 669 Times in 467 Posts
Originally Posted by Garry Walker
-
30th March 2011, 11:58 #27
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Posts
- 7,129
- Like
- 3
- Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Karthikeyan is a very poor driver, and he will struggle all year to make the 107% rule. I would much more have preferred them to keep Chandhok.
Liuzzi was squeeze into a race further down the line, where the track conditions are more equal? Or in the wet?
But on the whole I can't see them lasting much longer in F1.Niente è vero, tutto è permesso
-
30th March 2011, 12:03 #28
- Join Date
- Feb 2001
- Posts
- 8,414
- Like
- 488
- Liked 793 Times in 587 Posts
Time to sell .
I know of a guy who wants in .
-
30th March 2011, 12:33 #29
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It was the right decision not to let them race, regrettably. They were so painfully slow, and neither driver seemed particularly aware of their surroundings. It would have been farcical.
I honestly don't have any sympathy for them. It's not like last season when the finances only came together at the last minute - they had a whole year to prepare and even with the two week "bonus" of Bahrain being cancelled they still couldn't cobble together a car until the day of first practice. Unexcusable.
I reckon they knew they wouldn't stand a chance, but if they skipped Australia they could have been DQd from the whole season so it was cheaper to turn up and do a lap then limp home.Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
30th March 2011, 12:40 #30
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Location
- Sep 1666
- Posts
- 10,462
- Like
- 15
- Liked 201 Times in 155 Posts
I find this most encouraging:
Originally Posted by Dylan HThe Old Republic was a stupidly run organisation which deserved to be taken over. All Hail Palpatine!
What i say - when it is meant, all the small things go your direction. It seems more and more this is TN year!
[WRC] Croatia Rally 2024