Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 84

Thread: The NGTC Thread

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    229
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    The question is... will they be around the back of the grid for which of the following reasons?

    No setup time to get the best performance
    Poorly engineered, and just won't be as quick regardless of setup time
    Privateer drivers abilty
    Privateer budget constraints

    I'm all for the idea, but if the cars aren't competitive there will be all sorts of reasons given until they're allowed to turn the power up to counteract all of the above.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    East Devon
    Posts
    3,569
    Like
    313
    Liked 106 Times in 60 Posts
    Not long till we find out how fast these new machines are, Wrathal's Avensis looks sooo good!



    http://www.touringcartimes.com/article.php?id=5909

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,704
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Well its not looking too good is it? GPR Motorsport don't seem to have done a very good job...
    2nd place in the big quizz challenge!

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    19,105
    Like
    9
    Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
    With all due respect to the drivers, teams and GPR, being over three seconds off the pace round the Indy circuit is a big, big gap. How does this compare to Thompson's times in the Avensis at the Brands Indy meeting last year?

  5. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    East Devon
    Posts
    3,569
    Like
    313
    Liked 106 Times in 60 Posts
    Early days yet, but it is pretty disappointing that they couldnt get the cars turned out in time to give the teams some proper running with the cars.

    What are the rules for testing and shake downs these days?

  6. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,704
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BDunnell
    With all due respect to the drivers, teams and GPR, being over three seconds off the pace round the Indy circuit is a big, big gap. How does this compare to Thompson's times in the Avensis at the Brands Indy meeting last year?
    There's a suggestion that the time published wasn't accurate!
    2nd place in the big quizz challenge!

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    229
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Alfa Fan
    There's a suggestion that the time published wasn't accurate!
    Shock horror!

    I seem to remember stop watch times didn't correlate at the time. But there is no information on the weight or power of the car that ran then...

    Or today's drivers are just 'that' bad

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,704
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    I don't think you can say that about Frank. He's G50 champion after all.
    2nd place in the big quizz challenge!

  9. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,704
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    2nd place in the big quizz challenge!

  10. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    4,704
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 7 Posts
    Interesting post by someone going by the name "fabricator" over at the btcc.net forums. Seems to confirm suspicions that GPR are an utter shambles. I'm worried that on the car side its such a mess that TOCA might be better off getting a new outfit in to either sort out the existing cars or build up some new ones. It's been terrible PR for the new regs so far.
    2nd place in the big quizz challenge!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •