Results 11 to 20 of 21
Thread: Finances
-
4th April 2011, 13:53 #11
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by barryfullaloveUseful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
4th April 2011, 13:57 #12
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave B
-
4th April 2011, 13:57 #13
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by MarkUseful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
4th April 2011, 14:17 #14
Oh ffs! Did I state anything other than personal choice? I thought that the bit where I wrote "my first choice" gave the game away somewhat Anyway, although I don't actually know the viewing figures I'm willing to guess that there would be less people watching the Athletics World Championships than if they'd got the CWC. I'd say that the Beeb should be broadcasting what is in the public interest, the fact that someone else can do the same is neither here nor there.
Anyway, transporting 5 presenters plus however many technical and camera bods to each and every event may be cheap by telly standards but I fail to understand why cuts should be one massive cut rather than lots of little cuts. It's like when you see councils cutting their budget but simultaneously throwing money away in other areas. I'm willing to bet that the inefficiency of the Beeb and other large corporations is costing a pretty penny every year. And don't even get me started on the waste of money that they've built oop North.You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
4th April 2011, 14:27 #15
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by barryfullalove
Anyway, transporting 5 presenters plus however many technical and camera bods to each and every event may be cheap by telly standards but I fail to understand why cuts should be one massive cut rather than lots of little cuts.
And don't even get me started on the waste of money that they've built oop North.Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
4th April 2011, 14:56 #16
These things find a home of their own eventually. Rallycross hardly has a mass following but gets shown, likewise truck racing etc. Fair enough it may not end up on one of the main Sky channels but a home would be found.
I don't care if it makes no difference at all, cutting EJ from the show would benefit us all What I'm trying to say is that cost cutting across the board can aid these things, few less people flying to F1, few less pies for Phil Mitchell etc. Like I said earlier, I'm willing to say that the production costs for MotoGP v F1 are still a fair chunk of cash different...and the bikes are more interesting. And while it may not save much in percentage terms it would still save money, moving your £5k from a 2.5% apr ISA to a 2.6% ISA doesn't change much in percentage but you'd still do it.
I know that TV centre needed replacing, but the cost of the fancy dancy building that they're replacing it with is stupid. Knowing the sort of designs that architects like to come up with, and seeing some of the site pictures, I can assure you that a lot of money has been wasted in that build.You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
4th April 2011, 15:07 #17
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by barryfullalove
MediaCity will also house some ITV productions, public galleries and theatres, and living space. Anyway, why shouldn't a cultural centre be lavishly designed? It's going to sit there for decades, so it might as well be nice to look at, plus there's plenty of evidence to suggest that staff retention and productivity rates are better in good quality buildings.Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
4th April 2011, 16:01 #18Originally Posted by Dave B
Here we go http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8536356.stm
The new broadcasting centre at Pacific Quay in Glasgow went over budget by £62m and faced a year's delayThe extension of Broadcasting House has cost £100m more than planned and was due for completion in 2008, a National Audit Office report found.The Pacific Quay project, which cost £188m, ran into delays.
It had been originally budgeted at £126m, although this was revised upwards when the BBC opted for a bigger building and more advanced technology.
BBC's Salford centre is set to be completed around £76m under budget.
However it's huge sums of money to spend and, probably without too much effort, could have been reigned in by substantial amounts. £100m overspend on one building shirley shows massive mistakes by the consultants used, or a massive change of mind (which seems to be what buggered Glasgae). When you're building anything the moment you start moving the goalposts it'll cost you more.You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.
-
4th April 2011, 16:08 #19
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by barryfullalove
-
4th April 2011, 16:10 #20
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 19,105
- Like
- 9
- Liked 77 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave B
How do people watch that and say there's too many/no need for tarmac rallies? Crazy. Is it sped up footage?
[WRC] Croatia Rally 2024