Results 11 to 12 of 12
-
20th March 2011, 20:15 #11
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Perth, Australia
- Posts
- 5,675
- Like
- 6
- Liked 47 Times in 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Bagwan
You can't sponsor the team without using their name, but you don't have to talk aboutthe other sponsors. Thats the beauty of "Owning" the constructors name not just being title sponsor."I" before "E" except after "C". Weird.
-
21st March 2011, 11:55 #12
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,821
- Like
- 2,088
- Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
Latest twist in the Lotus naming case: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/90077
I'm getting a bit fed up of this. To me the Lotus car company own the brand "Lotus" and therefore they should have the right to use it if they want (even if they're nothing to do with the former Lotus F1 team)
I'm all for new teams coming into the sport but I wish Fernandes would try and make his own history instead of buying somebody else's.
Hoping for a swift and clear conclusion to this case!
"Pavlos Athanassoulas, the event director of the Acropolis Rally Greece, told Cosmote TV in an interview that all three manufacturers agreed that the current classification period should be respected...
WRC main class in 2025