Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    338
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post

    No Upgrades Allowed

    This is an idea and i think its a reasonable one.

    The cars that the teams spend millions on building in the off season, should be the car they have to race with for the whole season.

    So no upgrades once the season starts, this would end the whinging drivers always complaining saying "the car will be better, once we get the new aero package on it"

    or as a compromise an upgrade window half way through the season, or something similar, ie, like the transfer window they have in football.

    Discuss.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,422
    Like
    101
    Liked 100 Times in 76 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuartf12007
    This is an idea and i think its a reasonable one.

    The cars that the teams spend millions on building in the off season, should be the car they have to race with for the whole season.

    So no upgrades once the season starts, this would end the whinging drivers always complaining saying "the car will be better, once we get the new aero package on it"
    And if this happens, instead of Brawn winning the first 6 out of 7 races in 2009, they would have won over 15+ over the course of the season.

    Do really you want to watch that?

  3. #3
    Senior Member MrJan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Exeter
    Posts
    8,093
    Like
    28
    Liked 335 Times in 204 Posts
    ^^^^What Koz said. If you don't allow upgrades then you just get a whitewash. One of the interesting things of F1 is watching teams try to catch up with the early pace setters, Brawn GP is a perfect example.
    You're so beige, you probably think this signature is about someone else.

  4. #4
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,577
    Like
    78
    Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
    If such a rule were to be applied it would be the death of F1 and quite probably the worst thing that has ever happened to it, and there's been some bad ones!
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Oradea
    Posts
    2,637
    Like
    75
    Liked 137 Times in 110 Posts
    horror

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    everywhere. always.
    Posts
    1,892
    Like
    0
    Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Taking in-season development out of F1 is like taking the goals out of football. It ruins the whole point of the sport, and it will essentially be not much different to any othe single seat series.
    Congratulations Sebastian Vettel. Champion of the season of seasons.

  7. #7
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    terrible idea, what everyone else said
    you can't argue with results.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Tazio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Diego, Ca
    Posts
    15,383
    Like
    1,117
    Liked 645 Times in 510 Posts
    +1
    May the forza be with you

  9. #9
    Senior Member 555-04Q2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Durban, South Africa
    Posts
    7,996
    Like
    17
    Liked 16 Times in 16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuartf12007
    This is an idea and i think its a reasonable one.

    The cars that the teams spend millions on building in the off season, should be the car they have to race with for the whole season.

    So no upgrades once the season starts, this would end the whinging drivers always complaining saying "the car will be better, once we get the new aero package on it"

    or as a compromise an upgrade window half way through the season, or something similar, ie, like the transfer window they have in football.

    Discuss.
    One of the worst ideas in the history of worst ideas
    "But it aint how hard you hit, it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done." Rocky.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    25,044
    Like
    0
    Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    That is the worst idea in the history of entertainment since Abraham Lincoln said, "I'm sick of kicking around the house all day, let's go take in a show."

    Sorry Stuart, but in addition to the comments above your idea also wouldn't solve the problem of "teams spending millions". All that would happen is the budget would be used in other areas, or shifted to more R&D.
    Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •