Results 21 to 30 of 54
-
18th March 2011, 09:26 #21
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 603
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark
What I was trying to put forward (in my own inadequate way) was for the powers that be to calculate the fuel allowance for race distance, then increase it by X amount to allow the driver 5/6 or 7 three second boosts during the race for overtaking or for accelerating away from a following car.
If you remember during the turbo day's the boost was used in exactly that way, and in my humble opinion the racing was far better.
Regards scaliwag.loloaqici82qb4ip?
-
18th March 2011, 09:28 #22
- Join Date
- Apr 2000
- Location
- Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 38,577
- Like
- 78
- Liked 125 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by scaliwagPlease 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums
-
18th March 2011, 09:38 #23
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 603
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
While I'm usually against things like push to pass buttons that we get/got in Champ Car/IRL, it's actually not a bad idea when put like this. If you say it can be used whenever the hell you like, but yeah with a maximum fuel allowance, more of which gets burned up. In that way isn't not actually that much different to in the old turbo days when a driver would turn the boost up into qualifying mode when he needed to get past someone.
The worst part about the wing is that it can't be used in defence and only within the "overtaking zone" (puke), so it's not exactly a level playing field.[/QUOTE]
Agreed V12,
Re your turbo comment, I missed your post whilst I was replying to Mark, but you are spot on, and as I stated to Mark the racing was far better then.
Regards scaliwag.loloaqici82qb4ip?
-
18th March 2011, 09:56 #24
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 603
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark
If not, by all means let the teams decide, no boost= X gallons---Boost=X gallons+X
My extrapolation was for no change in the existing refueling rules.
Regards scaliwag.loloaqici82qb4ip?
-
18th March 2011, 10:39 #25
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 25,044
- Like
- 0
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark
The same should apply to KERS: if you're going to allow it, then let the teams decide whether the weight penalty is worth the gain.
We could see some teams opting to start with more fuel (and weight) but use their p2p button loads; others may forgo the use of the boost but enjoy the advantage of lighter cars at the beginning of the race.
The flappy wings, however, have no place in F1.Useful F1 Twitter thingy: http://goo.gl/6PO1u
-
18th March 2011, 13:34 #26
- Join Date
- Jan 2001
- Location
- Sunny south coast
- Posts
- 16,345
- Like
- 0
- Liked 26 Times in 26 Posts
Remember what a great idea adjustable front wings were last year. They were going to help overtaking weren't they. That worked didn't it.
Riccardo Patrese - 256GPs 1977-1993
-
18th March 2011, 13:40 #27
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Location
- Cuyahoga Falls
- Posts
- 2,262
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ArrowsFA1Plasma tv's are okay, but I'm holding out for whole blood. :vampire:
-
19th March 2011, 01:32 #28
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 5,943
- Like
- 1,228
- Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by Kevincal
every year new rules, new changes and no consitency
this idea is so pathetic and what;s worse it is managed and adjudicatdd by the FIa, an organization that has show very little in either partiality or admiiting when mistakes have been made.
I can see the first incident in the first race with an RBR or Mclaren driver claiming the system wasn't working as they were trying to pass a Ferrari, or somehow one car getting a more favorable zone than another because the guy "forgot" to monitor the zone properly, or the wrong car being activated in a 3 way battle allowing the 3rd car to pass the 2nd and 1st car ahead of him. This whole thing really has more downsides than upside and that being said will probably be abandoned by the time we get to Barcelonayou can't argue with results.
-
19th March 2011, 01:35 #29
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 5,943
- Like
- 1,228
- Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by scaliwag
It will then be interesting to see how many PtoP a driver has left and what strategies they employ in using it,
then again why not integrate it into kers and kill 2 birds with one stone?you can't argue with results.
-
19th March 2011, 10:01 #30
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Posts
- 603
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by truefan72
Yep all for it.
Regards scaliwagloloaqici82qb4ip?
I am from Gran Canaria. I am absolutely convinced that there will be no problem with the rally.
[ERC] Rally Islas Canarias 2024