UN

[glauistean]

Hahaha....Only a fool would believe that. The US and their policies prevented nuclear war.
Name me one significant act that the UN did to prevent a Nuclear war.Created IAEA



[quote:88k1htjq]

Show me exactly how UNICEF did that? UNICEF is one of the most corrupt organizations on the planet and despotic Governments have been using UNICEF supplies to manipulate their people for decades.Biafra







The UN had nothing to do with that. Apartheid ended due to strong political pressure and negotiation from the US and the UK. United Nation General Assembly boycotted certain tournaments that SA was to be the host. Springbox vs B&I Lions for one.

Most notably they stopped the sale of weaponry to SA and under threat of an embargo they held election open to everyone in '94.




Keep on with the insults. It only shows how weak your philosophy is



Mussolini and Franco were both socialists.Don't make me answer this as it is too transparent that you are not an educated person. Franco a socialist..ahhahhaha



So you are claiming that the policies including eugenics, which treated Jews and other minorities as sub-human are Right Wing? You do realize that it is the Left that advocates population control of undesirables don't you?Left advocates population control? Interesting. Eugenics got a great start here in the US. Tell me. Are the Aryan Nation, White Supremacists, KKK left wing or right. It should be rhetorical.


Isn't that always the argument for all who advocate Socialism? So how would that be evidence to the contrary?




Please, please......Try to acquire some historical knowledge.
Actually Rohm was killed in a power play by Hitler and Himmler. The Alleged homosexuality was used as a justification of the purging of him and the rest of the SA leadership. Boy, you are obtuse. I stated he was killed because of his socilist ideals and homosexuality. Now, even you should have known to whom I was referring. I doubt you even knew of Rohm or the SA.



No. Actually you arguments are simplistic and naive



That some backwards twit agrees with you doesn't make it a fact. If you are not going to even seriously try to present and coherent argument don't even bother. You are just wasting everyone's time.[/quote:88k1htjq]

Time is being wasted and now having spent ten minutes on this friggin post I am done with you. Arguing with an intellect such as yours is intolerable.

[Roamy]

Vop is he calling you a dumb Sh!t

[anthonyvop]

Time is being wasted and now having spent ten minutes on this friggin post I am done with you. Arguing with an intellect such as yours is intolerable.

Glockenspiel,

You have yet to produce one shred of evidence of any real success by the UN. Your revisionist history not withstanding. nothing you stated is proof.

So just go away and come back when you can at least make a mediocre attempt at defending your indefensible beliefs.

[markabilly]

I heard a rumor that Hitler not only had some Jewish blood, but that it included the genectics of black jews from africa........oh no what will the Klan do about such terrible lies

[Tazio]

I heard a rumor that Hitler not only had some Jewish blood, but that it included the genectics of black jews from africa........oh no what will the Klan do about such terrible lies

Plus he was born Catholic
And that explains plenty

[Bob Riebe]

Plus he was born Catholic
And that explains plenty

You can be born Jewish, but you cannot be born catholic or any other denomination.

[Tazio]

Tell that to my mother Dr. Spock!
I guess you would have to experience it

ailor: never mind!

[ArrowsFA1]

All you do is insult those who disagree with you instead of providing a logical argument supporting your beliefs.

And your logical argument supporting your beliefs is where exactly?

You've asked what the UN has done in the last 30 years that could be considered effective and successful? You have been provided with examples of the work the UN has done, and continues to do. Dismissing them simply and only because they come from www.un.org does not support your argument.

You don't provide any argument or evidence to suggest it has not been effective or successful, certainly not in a logical, coherent or reasonable way.

Perhaps rather than getting bogged down in the success or otherwise of the UN maybe you could answer this simple question with a logical argument:

If, as is clear, you feel the UN is a failure, why has it failed? What factors have contributed to this failure?