Results 121 to 130 of 130
Thread: 2011 fia rally car classes
-
16th November 2010, 16:40 #121
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,833
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
It doesn't need to be homologated for Monza Show.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
16th November 2010, 16:41 #122
- Join Date
- Nov 2008
- Posts
- 679
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mirek
-
16th November 2010, 16:41 #123
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,833
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
No problem
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
16th November 2010, 20:32 #124
- Join Date
- Jul 2001
- Posts
- 7,892
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Any news on the full list of classes for 2011? Or still waiting for official FIA news?
R1
R2
R3
R3T - 1.6 or 2 litre FWD - Restrictor size?
R3D - diesel 2 litre FWD or myth?
R4 - Confirmed but nothing mentioned on restrictor size yet?
Super Production - 1.6 turbo and restrictor size?
GT - coming during 2011 as things still being evaluated.
WRC - 1.6 turbo - restrictor size is confirmed as?Nav
-
16th November 2010, 21:01 #125Originally Posted by navtheace
R3T = 29 mm (20,5 mm if two turbos)
R3D = 32 mm (22,6 mm if two turbos)
Super production = 32 mm / 2,5 bar boost (not yet confirmed anywhere)
WRC = 33 mm / 2,5 bar boost (not yet confirmed anywhere)
The only open issue is R4 but it’s only two weeks ago FIA decided to create R4. Maybe we have more information after the WMSC meeting in December.“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
16th November 2010, 22:55 #126
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 4,237
- Like
- 61
- Liked 199 Times in 118 Posts
R3D, does it must have sequential gearbox?
-
16th November 2010, 23:06 #127Originally Posted by Barreis
About half way starts the English section.
R1-R3:
http://argent.fia.com/web/fia-public.../260_10-11.pdf
R3T & R3D:
"Article 260 (for Type R3 cars) applies to cars in Groups R3D and R3T with the exception of the Articles mentioned below:"
http://argent.fia.com/web/fia-public...%29-031209.pdf“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
17th November 2010, 15:18 #128
I hadn’t been reading the GP Week for I while but today I catch up.
In issue 105 (page 46) there’s a story about the 2011 WRC cars rules. By the story it’s decided that the WRC cars restrictor is 33 mm (and 2,5 bar) but the restrictor size for the S2000 1.6 turbo engine has not yet been decided “as experience is being gained as to equivalence between old 2-litre atmospheric and the 1.6-litre turbo units”.
Mirek said (post #107) that the restrictor size would be 31 mm for the S2000. First I considered it as a spelling error but I’m not so sure anymore. How is it Mirek. Was it a spelling mistake or do you know something?
The min weight for both WRC and S2000 will be 1200 kg.
http://mag.gpweek.com/?iid=41840
In the short news they say that M-Sport will continue to use a 2-litre NA engine in the S2000 and doesn’t have any current plan to update the car with the 1.6-litre turbo engine.“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
17th November 2010, 15:48 #129
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,505
- Like
- 7,833
- Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
I don't know anything for sure. Just heard 31 mm from more sources than 32 mm
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
17th November 2010, 16:08 #130
Ok, thanks.
If the aim for the S2000 1.6T is somewhere between 280-300 PS with a 31 mm restrictor, the WRC version could have about 315-335 PS with the about 13% (area) bigger restrictor.“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
Hulkenberg pleased to ‘steal’ another point for Haas as Magnussen rues costly contact with Tsunoda. Nico Hulkenberg expressed his satisfaction after taking advantage of a drama-filled Chinese Grand...
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...