Rally rating - poll

[Magnus]

With MC and Sweden over with, we now await Norway. What would you guys think abt having a poll abt how good we think the rallies have been, before to much of the season have passed?
The rating should be based on factors like excitement (good battles and so on), conditions, weather, number of competing cars and so on. All in all, regardless of wheather we could follow the rally live or if we had to follow it by computer, what we thought of the whole competition.

My suggestion is that we have a points system between 1 and 10, and that we at the end of the season will present our own Rally of the year!

Of course: every forumer might be biased when it comes to their home rally, but I guess we will have to buy that!

/Magnus

[jso1985]

in a few words(and numbers)

Montecarlo: 5.5
Sweden: 7

[N.O.T]

nice idea....

Monte: 4
Sweden: 5

[Jarek Z]

Monte - 3.5
Sweden - 5

[Kaps]

I must say I fail to see why Sweden was better than Monte?

[Josti]

* Monte Carlo - 4 (would rate 3 if it wasn't for Hirvo and Atko's close battle).
* Sweden - 6.5

I reckon Norway will be more interesting.

[GigiGalliNo1]

Sweden was more exciting, more cars and more drivers and Gigi of course but if you take away that I'm a big Galli fan, Sweden was a great round from my computer/office it was great to follow and hear all the news.

Yet to have watched Monte so about a 6/10

Sweden 8.5/10

[Helstar]

Montecarlo 4/10 would have been a 3 without the SSS

Sweden more cars-drivers, close battle (in the beginning in spite of all) and different stage winners, it deserves a 7.5/10

[Xeroid]

Monte Carlo 3, cancelled stages, lack of coverage via www
Sweden 7, better competition, more excitement, better coverage.

[WRCfan]

Monte Carlo was a yawn fest, i dont usually turn off the video highlights but VERY nearly did, whats the point in watching something more boring then F1?