Results 1 to 10 of 28
Thread: Hockenheim testing
-
8th July 2008, 11:58 #1
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 229
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hockenheim testing
testtimes Update: 12:29
1. L. Hamilton McLaren MP4-23 1:15.550 36 pit
2. N. Rosberg Williams FW30 1:16.099 +0.549 35 pit
3. A. Sutil Force India VJM-01 1:16.516 +0.966 43 pit
4. N. Heidfeld BMW Sauber F1.08 1:16.593 +1.043 30 pit
5. N. Piquet Jr. Renault R28 1:16.856 +1.306 43 pit
6. K. Räikkönen Ferrari F2008 1:16.970 +1.420 17 pit
7. S. Bourdais Toro Rosso STR3 1:17.135 +1.585 43 pit
8. D. Coulthard Red Bull Racing RB4 1:17.361 +1.811 25 pit
9. K. Kobayashi Toyota TF108 1:18.118 +2.568 29 pit
10. A. Wurz Honda RA108 1:18.798 +3.248 29 pit
-
8th July 2008, 12:13 #2
I think they should ban in-season on tracks that are in the GP calendar... it often makes the races a tad boring if you don't add rain.
Even Belgium last year was boring!
-
8th July 2008, 12:23 #3
I agree with Malllen...you should not even be able to test on tracks which host GPs let alone just 2 weeks before the actual race!
Tito Vilanova = :champion:
-
8th July 2008, 12:33 #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 2,009
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've often wondered if it was that which always makes Monza boring.
-
8th July 2008, 13:07 #5
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 15,233
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, Lewis tested with the new fin.
Wonder if they use it in the race.
-
8th July 2008, 13:40 #6
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Posts
- 6,410
- Like
- 0
- Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by cosmicpanda
Anyway, Monza is once a year and therefore they have to test a low-downforce package. I'm not sure Paul Ricard has that sort of configuration.
Originally Posted by Knock-onThe world according to Taki Inoue: https://mobile.twitter.com/takiinoue/st ... 7249326080
-
8th July 2008, 21:31 #7
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 229
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Update: 18:14
1. L. Hamilton McLaren MP4-23 1:15.483 75 pit
2. K. Räikkönen Ferrari F2008 1:15.803 +0.320 63 pit
3. N. Rosberg Williams FW30 1:16.099 +0.616 87 pit
4. A. Sutil Force India VJM-01 1:16.516 +1.033 97 pit
5. S. Bourdais Toro Rosso STR3 1:16.533 +1.050 113 pit
6. K. Kobayashi Toyota TF108 1:16.570 +1.087 65 pit
7. N. Heidfeld BMW Sauber F1.08 1:16.593 +1.110 59 pit
8. N. Piquet Jr. Renault R28 1:16.856 +1.373 111 pit
9. D. Coulthard Red Bull Racing RB4 1:17.351 +1.868 67 pit
10. A. Wurz Honda RA108 1:17.825 +2.342 89 pit
-
9th July 2008, 18:42 #8
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 5,943
- Like
- 1,228
- Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
Originally Posted by Knock-on
Although it is ugly, that has no validity in a discussion of its practicality.
Renault and RBR seemed to have gained a bit of an advantage out of them but they seem to suffer in the wets or with windy conditions. I'd say keep testing them, but continue to race without them, until it is absolutely certain that they can give the cars a significant advantage over their closest rivals.you can't argue with results.
-
9th July 2008, 21:37 #9
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Kent, near Brands Hatch
- Posts
- 6,539
- Like
- 0
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by truefan72Opinions are like ar5eholes, everyone has one.
-
10th July 2008, 02:56 #10
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 2,063
- Like
- 1
- Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by cosmicpandaIceman: Adjective 1)Rapid, swift 2)Nickname of Kimi-Matias Räikkönen, a legendary Formula 1 driver
Those of "questionable knowledge" will be the scientists. You might think that rocket science is hard but: Rocket Scientist: Someone who understands Newton's Laws of motion and basic chemistry....
What's the first thing to come to...