Page 559 of 1269 FirstFirst ... 594595095495575585595605615696096591059 ... LastLast
Results 5,581 to 5,590 of 12690

Thread: WRC Testing

  1. #5581
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Timaru NZ
    Posts
    443
    Like
    107
    Liked 306 Times in 158 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by denkimi View Post
    i believe it is quite the opposite.

    formula 1 cars need to be able to reach speeds of over 300km/h, so they actually cannot use really big wings.
    they have long straights, and few corners, so they rarely have a lack of traction. but most importantly: without a high top speed they can't overtake.

    rallying is completely different. you often don't have enough traction, but very few moments where you hit top speed. and you don't need to overtake.
    so here it is much better to sacrifice some top speed to gain traction through a much bigger wing.
    Going sideways seriously disturbs the airflow both under and over the wing.

  2. #5582
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,505
    Like
    7,834
    Liked 11,152 Times in 4,427 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by denkimi View Post
    i believe it is quite the opposite.

    formula 1 cars need to be able to reach speeds of over 300km/h, so they actually cannot use really big wings.
    they have long straights, and few corners, so they rarely have a lack of traction. but most importantly: without a high top speed they can't overtake.

    rallying is completely different. you often don't have enough traction, but very few moments where you hit top speed. and you don't need to overtake.
    so here it is much better to sacrifice some top speed to gain traction through a much bigger wing.
    Going back to my example - the student formula is good to show that relatively large downforce is possible even at low speed. I was actually really surprised how much aerodynamic downforce can help on a twisty narrow track where the cars can't reach over 130 km/h and which looks nearly like a slalom between the cones. This particular car has active wings so that it can accelerate better because the max drag configuration is quite slow at straights (with opened wings this one does 0-100 @ 3,1s).
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  3. #5583
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    58
    Like
    0
    Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
    It seems that begins to gain some speed...

    Today Tests Yaris wrc!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsai39eVPYE

  4. Likes: dimviii (20th September 2016),Fast Eddie WRC (22nd September 2016),pantealex (21st September 2016),pino (22nd September 2016)
  5. #5584
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,093
    Like
    9,921
    Liked 16,095 Times in 6,984 Posts
    nice photo from Paddon testing




  6. #5585
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Timaru NZ
    Posts
    443
    Like
    107
    Liked 306 Times in 158 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk2 RS2000 View Post
    Going sideways seriously disturbs the airflow both under and over the wing.
    As is shown in the recent shot of Hayden testing

  7. #5586
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,955
    Like
    1
    Liked 1,133 Times in 607 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk2 RS2000 View Post
    Going sideways seriously disturbs the airflow both under and over the wing.
    unless it is designed to cope with that.

    if you expect the cars to be sideways all the time, like on gravel, you can design the wings so that it still creates downforce in that situation. that's why wings on rally cars are so different than those on circuit cars.

  8. #5587
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    18,897
    Like
    3,429
    Liked 9,358 Times in 4,972 Posts
    Ogier in Tarragona today.....



    #M-SPORTER

  9. #5588
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,316
    Like
    543
    Liked 2,262 Times in 893 Posts
    A bit easier to check out the changes in gravel spec. Definitely looks different head-on but can't quite put my finger on what has changed. Bigger front radiator area maybe?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMkTaVlqSVM
    RS Motorsport Media - Follow me on Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia

  10. Likes: dimviii (22nd September 2016),Thousandlakes (22nd September 2016)
  11. #5589
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,093
    Like
    9,921
    Liked 16,095 Times in 6,984 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Simmi View Post
    A bit easier to check out the changes in gravel spec. Definitely looks different head-on but can't quite put my finger on what has changed. Bigger front radiator area maybe?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMkTaVlqSVM
    different sound at antilag.

  12. #5590
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,093
    Like
    9,921
    Liked 16,095 Times in 6,984 Posts


    any more info of what that measures?

  13. Likes: pantealex (25th September 2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •