Search:

Shouldn´t be rocket science to get the R5´s to sound more.

For sure you are right about that. But still, must it be the digital way? 1? or 0?
There should be ways in the middle. You know Swedish word "lagom"?

I thought it over (blink to Mirek :) ) and still don´t see why not? @AnttiL I would say it´s not what spectators can see on liason, it´s about what marketing people will do about it. advertisings...

Could make sence to me, because same for all...

10+

Well, yes SUV´s are. As said, compared to the big older Volvo XC90´s and BMW X5...

So, there are SUV´s and SUV´s if you understand what I mean. ;)

(Btw - isn´t Citroen C3 a kind of SUV?)

It´s a new kind of SUV´s. Not like the old ones developed from huge Volvos or BMW´s.

New ones are slim, nice looking and will fit in very well in new WRC rules. End of discussion. :)

I would say Citroen C3 almost looks like SUV in street version...

To me I can watch Pumas or new SUV Yaris or whatelse brands come up with SUV. As long as they looks like rallycars and - SOUND like rallycars. With electric silence on the stages I maybe should start...

I remember going from GrB to GrA in 1987.

First I thought this will be boooring. But lost interest? Nope.

And it wasn´t boring. Exciting as ever, and we all know what developments came out...

Why not a good mix of previous generation and R5 (+). Add all that is not way expensive. Exclude rocket science gizmos on the new WRC cars... :)

Mirek, tell me if the interest in world rallying went down, changing from Group B to Group a, in 1987?

(I was there, I know the answer...)

Whatever if F1 means 0,7% and WRC vars is doubled to 1,5%...

Sounds reasonable.

However the quality of a WRC rally is another aspect...

Dieselengines can swallow so many different fuels... even environmental friendly ones.