Why should this be? I don't like the rotational policy at all but, if there is to be one, why should there be exceptions and why these events particularly?Quote:
Originally Posted by alexlake
Printable View
Why should this be? I don't like the rotational policy at all but, if there is to be one, why should there be exceptions and why these events particularly?Quote:
Originally Posted by alexlake
Dont know about GB, but our event is almost every year voted the best arranged WRC rally, also all teams support that it should be in every year, but the biggest reason I think is that it is very spectator friendly after all rally is a spectator sport and will never be anything else.Quote:
Originally Posted by sollitt
I also dont like the rotation idea it has once been tested already and did not work, also rallyes like Mexico and Japan dont courage much, often it seems that countries want the event because of tourist reasons and the rally arrangements are not taking very good care of.
are you new to the sport? Some events have more history and commercial importance than others, right now all score the same points but all are definitely not equal in the eyes of competitors or fans.Quote:
Originally Posted by sollitt
Right, like Tomi here already said, they tried it back in 1995/96.
Didn't work then, won't work now, either!
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaCo
Answer is.... Glenn Macneall :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by pantealex
The link regarding Brynildsen/Macneall:
http://www.norsk-rally.com/modules/m...D=2&C=2&I=5773
According to a portuguese report Guy Wilks will be doing 10 events for Subaru in 2009
Portuguese
English
I was hoping that Wilks would get into the Subaru..he is undoubtably fast. Now names will follow, hopefully big names.
The translation was calling it a Subaru official. Does it mean Wilks is in the SWRT MT2, being the teamate of Sarrazin and Tirabassi ?