Very excited for this rally, even though it's not as long as it used to be, it will still be something else and a very tough challenge. The art of speed vs reliability will matter most on this one.
Printable View
Very excited for this rally, even though it's not as long as it used to be, it will still be something else and a very tough challenge. The art of speed vs reliability will matter most on this one.
Bull bar and snorkel in wrc3. https://twitter.com/BenConsty/status...220221446?s=19
I guess that's one of the cars that didn't make it through scrutineering so they had to create their own event for them?
In a way yes, but it wouldn't work much when it's raining or snowing.
Making a rule that teams can't have (tent) roof over the car would be extremely artificial when even tiny 2 man teams on local rallies have them.....
When you have a tent, usually with tightly parked trailers/lorries next to it the looks are not much different than a modular "building". You could make a rule that forbids multiple-level buildings, but not sure if that really changes much.
Zasada is ready!
https://pl.motorsport.com/wrc/news/z...towym/6600758/
I do not really get it this entry list amendments. Majority of cars were in NAT class anyway. Part of them stayed in WRC rally but still cannot take points. And the rest was "exluded" and put into new rally, being in same NAT class. Moreover scorers and non-scorers in WRC rally are mixed...
Maybe Martin Prokop should switch his car back to this one? ;)
https://www.diariomotor.com/competic...dakar-2017.jpg