Was he with Jouhki? Didn't know that. Mökkönen had huge potential (all the way since Finnish Junior Championship '88) but it just never materialized on World level. 1000 Lakes 1995 was especially bitter moment :(
Printable View
Clearly this explains the comment why it's long time since teams fought for his driver. Only exception could have been Latvala back in days, but I don't remember how it went then. Hirvonen had to be "rescued" after the too early entry with Subaru. Gardermeister always seemed to end in the wrong team until 2005 when it was kind of too late.
I am not saying Jouhki doesn't deliver, but compared to how arrogant he seems in media, it's certainly not as great. (as mentioned out of the 5 drivers that won the title in last 20 years, none was his). Last one I remember is from last year (Germany or Finland I think).
Becs: "I am standing here with one of the most famous WRC managers...."
Joukhi jumps in in the middle of the sentence: "Correction, THE most famous WRC manager...."
Who else can you name? Veiby? How many titles? Jouhki already decided to retire but then Suninen(?) changed his mind
Looks like you missed my point here. He might well be the most known manager or even the "best".
But saying it about himself that way makes him look arrogant.
Tanak is the probably the fastest driver atm, but does not go around saying that, therefore he is popular. While Neuville who is a bit more vocal about himselff is considered arrogant. Jouhki seems to be on another level above that again.
Exactly. And I have no reason to hype up Jouhki any further, but his CV speaks volumes. Sure, not even his clients have been able to unseat any of the Sebs, but that hardly serves as any kind of base for a conclusion that he would have lost his touch or anything like that.
His resume is not exactly bulletproof. You mentioned only two Sebs, but Solberg, Burns and Gronholm won 4 championships in total in same period.
As mentioned Gardermeister always seemed to end in a wrong team (Seat, Mitsu just as it started to loose out and then Skoda). Hirvonens career almost got destroyed by the too early move to a full time drive at Subaru (granted this was also due to Burns illness).
His method of "buying" seats for "almost" ready drivers is disliked by a lot of people. The typical argument is that it created a new "norm" where even relatively established drivers with good speed are expected to "bring budget". Recent example Tidemand as a WRC2 champion didn't bring money, while Suninen who often was slower than him was pushed in with budget.
(btw. Veiby's method of never paying anything seems to be the other extreme, probably not good either). Sure this effect of "buying" places has been there for ages, but it becoming a norm is associated with Jouhki prbly due to that 2004 Hirvonen year.
This way the amount of money people bring is becoming more important than actual skills, so that you risk getting more "weaker" drivers with money than very good ones without money. Since none of his drivers won the title in last 20 years it's not so easy to argue that the drivers he brought in were really the best.
Still waiting for you to name a WRC manager with better one...
After a period (1986-1999) in which Jouhki's clients had took 8 out of 14 available titles. And as was already mentioned in this topic, Jouhki already retired (i.e didn't look for new drivers) after Latvala and actually returned with new talent only in 2015 with Suninen.
I struggle to figure out what Burnsie has to do with all this, but the fact that Hirvonen's career DID NOT get destroyed has to be counted as a major accomplishment for Jouhki as that's what managers are being paid for, right?
Oh yes, "buying seats", maybe the most hypocrite of all excuses. As team managers had never heard about that possibility before the big bad Jouhki introduced the method... Newsflash: securing funding has always played a big role especially in all motorsport.