That's what certain people seem to think, due to the teams slightly lackluster celebrations and the extreme attempts to pick up rubber all the way into the pitlane.
Printable View
That's what certain people seem to think, due to the teams slightly lackluster celebrations and the extreme attempts to pick up rubber all the way into the pitlane.
I'd be more concerned by the wear on Jenson's plank - that car was rubbing quite severely at Turn 8 for the entire race.
It was a strange atmosphere in the drivers' press conference, no doubt about it.
Lewis's subdued demeanor did seem a bit odd, that would certainly explain it. But surely Jenson will have mentioned to the team that the car needs to be up to the weight limit even when all the fuel has been taken out?
And they had enough gap to save a lot more fuel if they needed too.
And Webber's missing a few parts of his car too. Schumacher going to win his first race then? :p
Lewis didnt seem too excited after winning. strange, let's wait and see. and hope not.
I think there was a slight air of disbelief that Red Bull handed them the victory, plus some confusion over Jenson's unique way of saving fuel by racing his team mate!
I would have said Lewis was going to have more of an issue with that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewmcm
yeah, Luewis gets passed by the lapdog, naughty naughty....Hamilton did not like that at all......no matter his forced smile
the screaming about saving fuel was to get button to back off...that is all...
It's the "save fuel" thing.
Notice how just before the podium when Jenson asked Lewis this and Lewis turned his back on the camera and muffled his response.
Jenson's performance at the press conference was slick horrible to watch, but that's the price you pay for driving for McLaren.
I too think it was a subtle way of Whitemash to tell button to back off and bring home the 1-2Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
Indeed. We all know that "save fuel" is code for "don't race each other".Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
Fuel being "critical" must be team talk for "no really, seriously, don't race each other again". :p
save fuel....one would think that should be obvious code...of course there was the time that clark ran out at monza in 1967....before the time of re-fueling---
Lewis has just told the BBC that his muted celebrations were down to "mixed emotions" and the "confusion at the end".
I certainly think you'd look like a bit of an idiot to celebrate a win like that which was clearly only theirs because of Webber and Vettel's silliness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Brockman
Yup. A win's a win, but certainly McLaren had this handed to them on a plate.
agreedQuote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
but if it was MSC back in the day he would have leaped up in the air pumping fists and acting like he just performed the drive of his race. ;)
But i certainly understand the slightly muted celebration. To em it was more of Hamilton expressing relief at getting the win and putting some f the gremlins behind him. It was a tough race and he surely thought after the pitstop that he was going to be at best 2nd in the race.
You're right saving fuel wouldn't have changed anything, the car has to met a minimum weight with driver and without fuel.Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyL
i agree with many here , still while Lewis was seen coasting Jenson thought he could sneak past him and lewis immedietly reacted with ;no i am having none of it and pulled away from jenson, that is something stamp authority from Lewis.. despite foolish shunt from desperate vettel it was good race.. nice to see mclaren 1 2 after so long time .lol... however mclaren Vs redbull gap is definitely closed down to 1/10th of a second, mclaren revival towards championship, sings are there :-)
They were telling Lewis to save fuel laps before Button made his move, so I'm not buying that the team did it to keep them from racing. I think Jenson simple thought he could catch Lewis off guard and went for it. Lewis wasn't having it and both drivers knew it could hurt the fuel situation or worse, end up similar to the Red Bulls.
Thats exactly the way I saw it too.. I believe there may well have been some apprehension regarding their post race weights due to them racing each other when they should have been saving fuel.Quote:
Originally Posted by airshifter
ok that put things in perspective a bit and I can fully understand the somewhat downplayed celebrations.Quote:
Originally Posted by airshifter
Could it be that "save the fuell" talk is coded language by Mclaren to say do not overtake? with that in mind Hamilton was caught of guard by his teammate?
Its possible I suppose. Were they equally fuelled? I only heard that instruction on Hamiltons radio but that doesn't mean the same instruction wasn't relayed to Jenson... however when you consider the fact that the drivers are nearly always asked to pick up rubber to add every possible single gram in debris from the dirty parts of the track, post race legal weight may well be a fairly believable reason for the instruction.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daika
No it can't be the reason, because the car is weighed without fuel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zico
Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
You are right of course.. silly me.
I wonder how accurately they can predict fuel usage, when all factors are not possible to be taken into account fully.. slipstreaming, head/tail winds. Red Bull also used this 'excuse'? for Mark being in Fuel save mode.
Lewis cheats as he always do.
Jenson dont know how to cheat.
Have you ever noticed that no one replies to your wildly speculative and inaccurate posts?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mia 01
well said and if you go to the F1 official site and watch the video for 2010 turkey, it will explain quite nicely why LH was sorta upset at the end of the race. It provides radio from and to his car that I had not heard before which puts things very well in perspective.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel
http://www.formula1.com/video/
I guess Mia 01 would rather hold on to his misguided notions than deal with reality.
Why spoil a conspiracy theory with plausable explanations and facts? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by truefan72
In the fussing over Indy, and the lack of gas in Hunter reay's car appearing to cause a massive crash, it was said that at the end of an F1 race, all cars must have 1.5 gallons of fuel left in their tanks (not sure if true, or some reporter running off at the mouth)
my understanding is that the tanks are then drained and the cars weighed
In the days of tire wars, the reason for the pick up, was allegedly due to the desire of tire manufacturers to get samples of the opposition's tire material
so now I guess it must be to add weight, or so I guess---but I doubt this material adds much weight at all....maybe a pound or two?
I hadn't seen that, but it confirmed the suspicions I posted on this and other threads. Before the pass attempt they (Speed reporters) had said Lewis was told to conserve gas during the break, which ended at the start of lap 45. After the pass attempt they aired the radio transmission to Jenson, which stated he needed to save more fuel, leading me to think he had already been told to conserve fuel.Quote:
Originally Posted by truefan72
In either case that video shows that either the team was attempting to screw Lewis over (at least part of the team) or that Jenson wasn't being a team player. It would be interesting to know which it is, but in either case it should show a rift between either the drivers, or their respective supporting teams.
Maybe, but both drivers still fought fair, and Lewis ultimately stamped his authority over Jenson. At the end of the day, it could just be that JB's smooth driving style is faster when 'going slow' than Lewis'. But I don't see any great rift or conspiracy blowing up.Quote:
Originally Posted by airshifter
I think the pickup was to put weight back onto the tires that have been worn off during the race*Quote:
Originally Posted by markabilly
*Statement based on no real facts.
I agree it was a clean battle, but I'm sure after being assured on the radio that Jenson wasn't going to attempt a pass, Lewis was probably less than happy when he did.Quote:
Originally Posted by SGWilko
The closure rate leads me to think that Jenson was hoping to take advantage of the situation, regardless of any team involvement. After all had Jenson been that much faster at any other time in the race the move should have come much earlier.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/84215Quote:
Originally Posted by airshifter
Nearly, but not quite!Quote:
Originally Posted by Autosport