I have the same issues for sometime. Sometimes it is very very slow, sometimes I can't get access.
Printable View
I have the same issues for sometime. Sometimes it is very very slow, sometimes I can't get access.
I couldnt access the forum at all this morning but now it's up again.
It's a shame those responsible cant be around regularly to monitor and fix the issues.
I posted on the Feedback section weeks ago but had no reply.
its sucking so bad here for me that i even lost interest in coming more to the forum over these last months.
most of the times the page dont even open for me
Its been on and off for months, sometimes i just give up for days.
Sad if this place dies bcs of bad service from hosts.
Specially for us that tries to quit facebook.
Sent fra min SM-S901B via Tapatalk
If this site ever dies, maybe we could all migrate to another forum, like the following one ?
Bookmark this for possible future use:
https://www.rallyforums.com/forums/#...rld-rallying.3
It's way more modern and similar to other car forums I use.
What there has been is in "World Rallying" ...
https://www.rallyforums.com/forums/world-rallying.9/
I have a question for the technical experts here:
Back in the days, drivers would often use the Scandinavian flick to set up the car for a corner. It is often said that this changed when Sébastien Loeb introduced a cleaner, more racing-like style, which was faster and subsequently got adopted by the other drivers.
Now I was wondering: Was the cleaner style always the faster one, and people just didn't know better? Or was the Scandinavian flick actually faster for the cars in the 70's/80's/..., but less fast when used with modern-day rally cars?
If it is the latter, what were the changes that led to the advantage of the cleaner style? Would it be possible to undo these changes or introduce new regulations that lead again to an advantage of using the Scandinavian flick, without compromising safety?
Cleaner style came with the technical development of the cars. There were several issues depending on how far back should we go. So there was turbo lag. Older systems were all or nothing. If a driver braked traditionally and dropped the RPMs, the car would have zero power on the exit for couple of seconds. By throwing the car sideways (or using left foot braking), drivers could stay heavy on the throttle to keep the turbo spooling while using the slide to scrub speed. It was fixed when they introduced Anti-Lag System (ALS) which came with group a cars (I think). Group b had this turbo lag issue.
Also diffs.. early 4wd was quite dumb compared to today. They often suffered from massive understeer (the car wanting to go straight). The flick was a way to force the car to rotate early so it was already pointed at the exit by the time it reached the apex.
Also the suspension was nowhere near what we have now. Tyres didn't have so much lateral grip.
So this faster style is mainly result of different technological advancements.
For those who weren't here while user 'Pentti' was still with us, his real name was Pentti Airikkala and his results are listed here:
https://ewrc-results.com/profile/1326-pentti-airikkala
A great character and sadly missed.
Thanks for the explanations!
Sorry for later answer, I have just returned from Sierra Morena (when I am present on events, I dont post info anywhere (except Rally-base) as I have lot of work to do there). I will try to contact Mark (owner of this forum) via email and ask him to check the situation with hosting and errors. But I know very well how difficult is to run this old forums on modern sites (we are running similar on forum.autosport.cz). Every forced upgrade of software on server means another troubles with this old forums systems. And any new try to upgrade or fix the current settings can destroy everything... But like I told, I will try to write to Mark.
I have answer from Mark:
Hello!
The server had run out of disk space, I have cleared away some old test forums which were taking up space. And I have fixed the user registration options, at least I hope I have.
The server is pretty old now, it has a continuous uptime of 11 years now! I should probably do something with it, my job is working for web hosting company after all, maybe that's the issue!
Mark
Seems like the server or software doesn´t remember that you´re logged in... Need to do it everytime one been away for just hours.
Let me know if there is any monetary way of supporting the forum. If I could DM you I would :D
I had issues with this in the past when I was starting at page motorsportforums.com ; since I am starting at https://www.motorsportforums.com/forum.php, I dont have any issues.
Even DMs are back, profile views, can't fault it!
And welcome to new member LebJe252!
Thanks.
So what do you guys think of this rumour? https://rallyjournal.com/report-wrc-...ormer-f1-boss/
According to the report, the commercial rights are set to be acquired by an investment group led by former Formula 1 team boss Eric Boullier. According to Dirtfish, the promotion deal is a major one and could run until as late as 2051. This would make the contract as long as 25 years.
Coming from the service park, it's true. An announcement will be made on day before the rally starts in Greece.
another liberty media?
It was interesting hearing the comments of current and former drivers in the Diftfish video about the how the next promoter can improve the WRC.
One of the comments which i keep hearing is the need to create a buzz about the drivers and personalities. This is a deep rooted issue, and i believe the demise of the WRC has coincided with two major issues which are intertwined. Cost at the top, and the lack of local / specialist drivers.
The cost issue is apparently being fixed. If it were my choice, I'd make an immediate shift to Rally 2 cars.
The local hero element may partially be remedied by cost reduction too. However, i feel that there's an even more obvious reason why we have less local drivers competing on their home events. They simply aren't fast enough anymore. I believe this is owing to the advantage they have lost from local knowledge and national events allowing them to practice the stages more often than WRC regulars. They can of course still apply their local knowledge, but this has all but been neutralised by WRC regulars analysing hours of in-car footage. I have no idea how this can be remedied, but the days of local heroes are gone which is sad for the fans, and ultimately means less entries.
Boullier is of course only "head" of the main investor. And I am afraid it will be only an investment and all current people will stay on their positions. So I am afraid there will not be so much changes...
I wouldn’t be so pessimistic. I think the bigger issue than the “current people” has been the lack of decision making, which is directly tied to the promoter and how they view the series. If they can’t make clear decisions, then the people working on the series can’t do much to improve it either. And I’ve always liked Boullier. For me he has seemed a analytically minded, ambitious and goal oriented person. And as it's an investment, there need to be some changes with plans how to improve the series and generate revenue.
Liberty didn't come in and immediately replace everyone from 'Bernie's' company at F1. They did it more by growing the number of people involved for a start.
It's no different any acquisition. They will learn the business and gradually replace people as they feel necessary. This is the way business's work.
How a Ford Kuga shows where WRC and motorsport is going wrong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkHFw1_p3qw
I think Jon's on the path to seeing why WRC27 is both necessary and inevitable. But not sure why he thinks the WRC and motorsport is going wrong? Maybe the title should be How a Ford Kuga shows why WRC and motorsport is going wrong.