i said they were put there to reduce punctures and not because of road deterioration....Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartusvuori
fact...how many punctures did we have ??? Solberg...
bye.
Printable View
i said they were put there to reduce punctures and not because of road deterioration....Quote:
Originally Posted by Hartusvuori
fact...how many punctures did we have ??? Solberg...
bye.
Kris has a 3 year contract. Add in that he was highly thought of at PSA in testing & developing cars. People forget he's actually quite inexperienced in a WRCar in WRC events.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirek
That proofs nothing. If there are anti-cutting poles to prevent cutting, of course it reduces punctures in the process. So - which was first?Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
If I'm not mistaken drivers said on first day most of the poles were removed after recce and yet there was only few punctures ... hence they were not put up to prevent punctures.Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
bye.
even if i was wrong (which i am not) i based my assumption on a fact i didn't made it up....
Poles were put there to reduce punctures (according to myself)...we didn't have that many puntures...who wins ??
bye bye.
Please point another source than yourself. Assumptions and inductive thinking is fine, but it doesn't produce facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
the fact is that we had less punctures....so my assumption was correct...
i did not say it because i had to find something wrong with it and nag...
Petter has been disqualified because of an under-weight car -> three more points to the paper champion = Loeb and Hirvonen tied at 196 points now.
Hirvoselle lisäpisteet - tasoissa Loebin kanssa - MTV3.fi - Urheilu - Ralli - Uutiset
Thisgrace.
That brings Ogier in even better position to attack in spain...nice.