If he's disappointed with Tanak, I don't know what he would say about Matthew if he weren't his son...Quote:
Originally Posted by Red bull
Printable View
If he's disappointed with Tanak, I don't know what he would say about Matthew if he weren't his son...Quote:
Originally Posted by Red bull
If he wasnt his son he wouldnt have driven anything bigger than a wheelbarrow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kielder
But Malcolm is right to be furious about Tanak in whom he invests lots of money. He doesnt have pressure for results and still crashes several times a day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii
I was making more a joke on Wilson than anything.... specifically the "gifting' of a WRC car and years of support to his son, which while the norm in motorsports, the combination of the publicised "5 Year Plan" and the often embarrassing reults never propted a public scolding from Papa-son.
Malcolm's management all these years sucks.Why do you expect something better in his interviews???The same brain desides and for the management and for the interviews!!!
aha didnt get the irony at your first post. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by janvanvurpa
Tanak is another Wilson jr.
No. Tanak has the speed , maybe not like Latvala but definitelly better than slowson. reliability to be improved. Time will tellQuote:
Originally Posted by Barreis
Estonian guys, plz tells us - who pay for Tanak? Whose money he use?
The fact that Tanaka has speed, he proved in Finland, ask Hänninen. But maybe he has the same problem as JML, the only way he knows how to run is flat out.
He's contracted with M-Sport, so I guess it's Malcolm's money :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Xsara Fan