+ they sound better and go more sideways.Quote:
Originally Posted by GINE
And there's more drivers who can win.
So what's the problem?
Printable View
+ they sound better and go more sideways.Quote:
Originally Posted by GINE
And there's more drivers who can win.
So what's the problem?
Last years sandells time was 8:01 this years 8:14 same cars same driver...so the stage is a bit slower this year but not by 40 seconds
Nice try, but ss times says that somebody else need help.Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
last year Sandell was slower than subarus.....learn to compare right. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
Kimi continues solid driving, hope he can do it whole weekend...
7:53 Sandells (he wasn't slower than any subarus during that pass) best time on the stage during pass 1 then in 2010...still 20 seconds with his time today....so the wrc of today lose around 10 seconds from those of last years (7:43-7:13 minus the 20 seconds from stages disadvantage of this years) in a 14kms section.....so around 0.8/km. still believe they are as quick ?
fighting with wilson is not considered solid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Julle69
Sandell at 2010 was loosing continously from Subarus of Tanak,Flodin and was much slower than faster s2000 crews.To compare Sandell with such low speed at 2010 to see if 1,6 wrc are fast IN 2011 is FAIL!Quote:
Originally Posted by N.O.T
sandells times from sagen 1.....
http://2010.vysledky-rally.cz/vysledky/?rz=251&filtr=
i do not see any subarus infront...do you ? you refer to second pass thats why you see the subarus infront
i used a same driver with the same car to see if the stage is any slower. because 40 in 14kms seconds seemed a lot to be honest.....the stage is indeed slower but still the cars are slower around 1sec/km....which is as expected.Quote:
Originally Posted by dimviii