:bulb: I guess we'll see!!....scro :dork:
Printable View
:bulb: I guess we'll see!!....scro :dork:
This thread once again confirms how liberals debate--largely ignoring the law and the facts of the case, while hurling insult not only at GZ but also fellow posters.
Namely who? :confused: :angel: Such a claim requires documentation!. :bulb: :bulb: :bulb:Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
yeah the liberals want the Italian court system - just keep trying them until they are found guilty.
I don't get it Alca - Why are you digging up Whitney?
Can I just ask for a link to this evidence of him getting rid of a burglary tool on the night? Nowhere seems to mention it, please don't like to any websites like http://www.liberalsallsuck.com or http://www.peoplewithgenitalwartsfortruth.com or anyting like that, something reputable, I'll even accept a link to Fox.Quote:
Originally Posted by Koz
No need
George Zimmerman trial: Chris Serino, lead detective in case of Trayvon Martin killing, takes stand again Tuesday - Crimesider - CBS News
A burglary tool found 5 or 6 days later. This sort of thing would have been completely inadmissable in court due to the time it took to turn up....... Anyone who's watched Law and Order knows that :rotflmao:
Quote:
Originally Posted by vhatever
http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/nationa...il-rights-suitQuote:
-- His GPS monitor has been cut off and George Zimmerman is free -- but only legally.
Zimmerman fears for his life. He's a reviled figure to millions, despite his acquittal Saturday night in Trayvon Martin's killing.
Zimmerman's attorney describes him as a marked man.
Zimmerman, 29, has kept his address under wraps for more than a year and worn a disguise whenever he left his four walls. He has often strapped on body armor, according to O'Mara."I think he has more reason now than ever to think that people are trying to kill him because they express they're trying to kill him, all the time, every day.
Sounds like he is a little concerned about his bro health to me.....Scro
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkPGl...layer_embedded
:bulb: :dozey: :bulb: :bulb: :dozey:
I agree that the jury delivered the only verdict that they could based on reasonable doubt. While I figured that OJ Simpson really did it, the jury delivered the proper verdict, as I have never seen such a circus. There are three levels of proof. In a civil case, preponderance of evidence. In some mixed type cases, it is clear and convincing. In the OJ case as well as Zimmerman, the prosecution did not even get to the clear and convincing level. Now in the OJ case, there was evidence that could have been clear and convincing, if properly presented, but they failed to do it to make it such. As to there being only two witnesses, that is incorrect as there is a third witness I spoke of in my first post. He did not see the beginning of the struggle, but heard the screaming and identified it as coming from the man on bottom who was being beaten by the man on top. He says Martin was delivering marital art style blows to Zimmerman. Based on clothing, the man on top was Martin. It is his phone call that contains the screaming that has been referenced repeatedly as to one of them screaming, help me. The shot is fired, but apparently not picked up in the recording. This case was tried based on the murder charge which requires an intent to kill or seriously injure without it being a planned premeditated killing (and some claim it should have been tried on a pure manslaughter type basis of negligence where it might have been more successful based on a lower level of intent). ----------------- The so-called castle doctrine had nothing to do with the trial, although under Florida law, there is a castle or stand your ground law, but it had nothing to do with the trial in this case, and was not even submitted to the jury. Only the self defense issue which in order to be answered, there must be a finding on the murder or manslaughter charge.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollo