What makes a person a citizen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Excuse me to all of you that have been trying to find the meaning of the word ontogenetic. You, as a result of my hitting the "r" instead of the "t" had to look in vain for the meaning.
As a result I shall remedy the situation and then the post should have more meaning.

.

---

It had more meaning with your freudian slip of the keyboard revealing your true disorder as I described and as put forth via herr aliquis.

The speaker had been deploring the fact that the present generation of his people was deprived of its full rights; a new generation, he prophesied like Dido, would inflict vengeance on the oppressors. He had in this way expressed his wish for descendents. At this moment a contrary thought intruded. 'Have you really so keen a wish for descendents? That is not so. How embarrassed you would be if you were to get news just now that you were to expect descendents from the quarter you know of. No: no descendents -- however much we need them for vengeance.' This contradiction then asserts itself [through these actions] setting up an external association between one of its ideational elements and an element in the wish that has been repudiated
(Freud, 1901, p. 14)




You can froth, troll and drool, but you can not hide from your personal stigmas that you see staring back in the mirror....

In other words, forget it, dude, you can not repudiate that which is your base nature no matter how much you try to inflict vengeance upon others in naming and labelling them with your own stigmas in a futile attempt at repression of them from your own conciousness.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by donKey jote

glaui, on keeping to the general topic of your thread, imagine this forum were a country.
You are an immigrant (you weren't born here and I doubt your parents were chit-chat forumers)...
Are you a citizen of this country?
Should anyone be granted unconditional citizenship simply by posting here?
Wouldn't you expect immigrants to inform themselves about and respect the culture of the country they choose to post in?

In my view you are a bit lacking in the third point. Your blatant disregard for the unwritten customs here (as opposed to many places on tinternet, where constant ranting/trolling/pissing contests are the rule of the land), don't make you a particularly "good" citizen in my eyes. But hey, each his own... I don't have to read you, I stopped even bothering a while ago.
:dozey:

---

So why the hell are you posting to me then?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by markabilly

It had more meaning with your freudian slip of the keyboard revealing your true disorder as I described and as put forth via herr aliquis.

The speaker had been deploring the fact that the present generation of his people was deprived of its full rights; a new generation, he prophesied like Dido, would inflict vengeance on the oppressors. He had in this way expressed his wish for descendents. At this moment a contrary thought intruded. 'Have you really so keen a wish for descendents? That is not so. How embarrassed you would be if you were to get news just now that you were to expect descendents from the quarter you know of. No: no descendents -- however much we need them for vengeance.' This contradiction then asserts itself [through these actions] setting up an external association between one of its ideational elements and an element in the wish that has been repudiated
(Freud, 1901, p. 14)




You can froth, troll and drool, but you can not hide from your personal stigmas that you see staring back in the mirror....

In other words, forget it, dude, you can not repudiate that which is your base nature no matter how much you try to inflict vengeance upon others in naming and labeling them with your own stigmas in a futile attempt at repression of them from your own consciousness.

---

That is now the second time that you have used that very same language when informed of the status of a/ my mother and b/ some patients. In future ,refrain from commenting on my threads or posts. I have no regard for you or your complete disregard of decency and compassion.

You used some vague post from Freud to attain some credibility. It does not work as the context if you understood its meaning would be blatantly obvious even to the most dense of the species.

You are inferring a use of Freud but you lack the manners to use the upper case to which the good doctor is surely entitled, to give yourself some points, but the obvious is so glaring that you have absolutely no idea about that which you speak. You are neither an Md nor a PhD. If you were that passage you deem to be of relevance including incorrect punctuation (most unusual) has no relevance and you are wont to believe that you are mastering me by the use of Freud, when Jung would be the more pertinent person to find the information. You must look to the synergy and symbiotic relationships when discussing what you are attempting.
I don't want to see your posts but you will do it anyway. It is my job to know these things and your narcissism and angst which is building to a very repulsive level warrants that you will not miss on the opportunity to spar.

By the way, who wrote the book you are referring to? Are you claiming it was from Freud? Or was it about Freud. In either case supply the answer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by henners88

Yawn.

---

Take a nap.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bob Riebe

Actually it is a term relating to the biological development of an individual organism, verses phylogeny, which refers to multiple organisms.

Ontogeny is related to developmental Psychology, not Psychiatry.
Psychiatry relates to mental disorders, not normal psychological development which is what Ontogeny deals with.

Perhaps you meant Psychobiology, not Psychiatry.
==============
You told Markabilly, your "patients" were incontinent. If so, drooling is not the problem.

---

Perhaps you should stop using google and ask a professional what specific terms mean. In fact, do me a favor and stop posting responses to me where you, like Markabilly fall into the category of dregs of society where you use the disorders of some to poke fun of others. A very sad person you.

A Psychiatrist is a medical doctor Md with a PhD in Psychology. A Psychologist is one who has a degree (PhD) in Psychology. Now Riebe, if you can grasp the fact that there is a difference between the two albeit not very significant you may be able to join in the discussion.
I meant psychiatry. Development includes that of the brain as well as the body. Sometimes, unfortunately, the brain does not develop which brings Psychology and Psychiatry into the question of ontogenetic development.

As for the incontinent remark that you deem funny you should have read on as I stated drooling was also an issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chuck34

Once again glauistean refuses to take a moment to self reflect on his posts. He demands that I show the post where he claims "psych cred", but refuses to admit that 90% of his posts do that. Every time he trys to diagnose, oh sorry give opinions, he is screaming out "look how smart I am, I know more than you about this subject. And even though it has nothing to do with the thread I starteed, I have "proven" my mental superiority. Therefoe my opinions are "right" on everything. And since you don't agree with my "truths", there must be some form of mental imbalance involved." And for someone with any interest in the human mind, i'd bet his case would be very interesting.

So sad, so predictable. And as I thought, he couldn't respond without diagnosing, excuse me again give opinions, someone. Sure since I directly challanged him, he didn't address me. However in his response to me he drug markabilly in to give him a mental defect.

Challange for you glauistean, can you go a month without responding to anyone telling them there are somehow mentally "off". The only exception is if it actually has to do with the thread. How 'bout it, you up to it?

---

Once again you are evading what was asked of you. If you think I am so smart I will take it as a compliment. The truth of the matter is I have never said a word about being smarter. Because I have studied medicine is a crime to you? That I am aware of biological issues as well as mental and post them is a threat to you. It certainly screams out that you are very insecure and threatened by me. You don't have to tell everyone about this. Anyone with a modicum of intellect can see it.

Post where I have stated that I am smarter than someone else, even you, and that will be that. Don't assume that when a person can speak in depth about neurosis or physical ailments that they believe they are smarter than you. They are only more educated in those fields than you.

Grow up and get some confidence in yourself. In addition I would suggest to you that you read what you write before posting. Thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Perhaps you should stop using google and ask a professional what specific terms mean. In fact, do me a favor and stop posting responses to me where you, like Markabilly fall into the category of dregs of society where you use the disorders of some to poke fun of others. A very sad person you.

A Psychiatrist is a medical doctor Md with a PhD in Psychology. A Psychologist is one who has a degree (PhD) in Psychology. Now Riebe, if you can grasp the fact that there is a difference between the two albeit not very significant you may be able to join in the discussion.
I meant psychiatry. Development includes that of the brain as well as the body. Sometimes, unfortunately, the brain does not develop which brings Psychology and Psychiatry into the question of ontogenetic development.

As for the incontinent remark that you deem funny you should have read on as I stated drooling was also an issue.

---

If you think the difference between a psychologist and psychiatrist is not significant, then you are as ignorant a farce as you seem.

Psychiatry is a branch of science that deals with mental disorders.
You should read your dad's text books more closely or quit trying to use Cliff notes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

Once again you are evading what was asked of you. If you think I am so smart I will take it as a compliment. The truth of the matter is I have never said a word about being smarter. Because I have studied medicine is a crime to you? That I am aware of biological issues as well as mental and post them is a threat to you. It certainly screams out that you are very insecure and threatened by me. You don't have to tell everyone about this. Anyone with a modicum of intellect can see it.

Post where I have stated that I am smarter than someone else, even you, and that will be that. Don't assume that when a person can speak in depth about neurosis or physical ailments that they believe they are smarter than you. They are only more educated in those fields than you.

Grow up and get some confidence in yourself. In addition I would suggest to you that you read what you write before posting. Thanks.

---

Chuck, don't feed that troll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by glauistean

That is now the second time that you have used that very same language when informed of the status of a/ my mother and b/ some patients. In future ,refrain from commenting on my threads or posts. I have no regard for you or your complete disregard of decency and compassion.

You used some vague post from Freud to attain some credibility. It does not work as the context if you understood its meaning would be blatantly obvious even to the most dense of the species.

You are inferring a use of Freud but you lack the manners to use the upper case to which the good doctor is surely entitled, to give yourself some points, but the obvious is so glaring that you have absolutely no idea about that which you speak. You are neither an Md nor a PhD. If you were that passage you deem to be of relevance including incorrect punctuation (most unusual) has no relevance and you are wont to believe that you are mastering me by the use of Freud, when Jung would be the more pertinent person to find the information. You must look to the synergy and symbiotic relationships when discussing what you are attempting.
I don't want to see your posts but you will do it anyway. It is my job to know these things and your narcissism and angst which is building to a very repulsive level warrants that you will not miss on the opportunity to spar.

By the way, who wrote the book you are referring to? Are you claiming it was from Freud? Or was it about Freud. In either case supply the answer.

---

I did supply the answer but you are too busy frothing, trolling and drooling to see it... :rolleyes:

very unusual as in the freudian sense, it is usually issues with the father, but I see you have instead something of a mother complex, perhaps in the mode of Hitler, for whom it was widely reported that Hitler loved her dearly and cried at news of her death.....the only reported sorrow that he displayed as an adult over the death of a person.

But i think perhaps not, because you are still in angst in striving to avoid your ultimate fate, and are still actively in the repudiation and transference stages


But as to Jung, most interesting you say that, as he claimed to have a great relationship with poppa, but mommie was far more strange, with night time events where her head was chopped off and she was floating around as a ghost at night...and then she would abandon him for long periods dealing with her despondent and demented personality...that caused Jung to conclude women flaws originate from "the innate unreliability of their personalities"

So one can easily deduce from simple logic that the origin of your personal stigmas sprew forth with your mother who must have abandoned you when you were an infant or child, and now abandons you in the final stages of dementia, while you have never been able to repudiate her nor accept her. And now the time is too late to accomplish either.

Then there is the drool that you frequently mention and attempt to cast upon others while seeking the vengenance you sought upon your mother but were denied; therefore, explaining the angry desire to cast your personality and faults upon others, then attack them for being that which you find so repulsive in yourself.

Borderline personality disorders, coupled with some paranoid schizophrenia, show in your behavior and often exhibits such violent transference on to others.

By casting the others as such in the world that you have created, you are now free to disassociate from reality and need not be concerned with the lack of any actual accuracy.

Even more problematic to you is your obvious fear that you will lapse into a catatonic state, to whence once borne, few return




So try not to stare into the mirror and drool, quit being so obsessive over mommie, get a little sunshine, sunshine, and maybe........



well, upon further reflection, naw, you be too :crazy: to be saved

Glauis....I feel what Henners does...YAWN....