Originally Posted by Chaparral66
What is going on here? Did any of you even read Jim Strong's letter? I think only one of you who posted after his letter appeared (tbyars) barely addressed its content, before you all got into personal sniping again. Yikes.
Please read what he is saying. He has some good ideas, a lot more than what has been posted on this forum recently (myself included) for all the debate we've been having as to how to resolve this mess we're all in, both CC and IRL fans. Strong has stepped away from being an advocate of either series and stopped drinking the split kool-aid altogether. His speaks for me and echos much of what Cmdr Keen and I have been debating on other threads.
Before you all get neck deep in further personal attacks, which seem easier that dealing the concept itself, I challange all of you to read Jim Strong's letter, and deal with the ideas he proposes.
At one point in his letter, Strong advocates for an even break up of the racetracks, in thirds, between ovals, roadcourses, and street courses. Nothing "ovalcentric" here (Strong does insist that the Indy 500 must be returned to its former level of greatness. Who could argue with that?). Is that a good idea? If not, why?
Strong also says it might be a good idea to make the cars run on alternate fuels, like diesel, as Audi does in ALMS. Good idea? Why or why not?
Strong also suggests maybe it's time for a team to choose the type of tires it wants to run, either red or normal tires for an entire race. How about that? Agree or disagree, and why?
Show me something. Show me you know as much as this guy Jim Strong, and if you don't like his ideas, what would you suggest? And keep it on the racing, if you can.
C'mon, bring it. I'm waiting.