And you think that was great and unique, huh?!Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Not sure why it starts to look that all the pro gun ownership people posting around here a re a bit infantile?
Printable View
And you think that was great and unique, huh?!Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Not sure why it starts to look that all the pro gun ownership people posting around here a re a bit infantile?
Quite. I have been called both a Communist and a fascist by anthonyvop, which suggests a degree of confusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Not all, as I said above. Let's be fair — some are much more palatable and educated than others.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Hey, look, the US is doing better then a bunch of 3rd world countries like for example Zimbabwe and Sudan! :sQuote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
And worse then Turkmenistan, Sri Lanka, Fiji! Good reason to use it as a pro-gun argument.
The best part is that the pro-gun people are also the people who mostly oppose Obama's push for a free access to medical services in the USA.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Whichever way you try they will be against it.
My bad, some are better than avop.Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Let me explain it to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
Being able to protect yourself is a right.
Free stuff isn't.
Simple huh?
Your explanation is certainly simplistic. Not quite the same thing, I know. Your definition of what constitutes a right is not, I have to tell you, gospel.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
In the US, it is not.Quote:
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Link please :D
There is nothing wrong with being a gun enthusiast, vehement or otherwise. It's what you DO with the gun that counts. Using it to hunt, target shoot, for personal protection, or having one just because the law says you can harms no one. It's those who use a gun to steal, maim or kill without any provocation that is the issue. The gun is only the instrument of choice which the criminal uses in their crime. I do not believe that taking guns from millions of law abiding owners, who have committed no crime, in order to address a couple of dozen mentally deranged individuals is a reasonable solution. So I say again, what about addressing what causes those very few people to commit such crimes?Quote:
Originally Posted by BDunnell