the concertina effect is real. i never said it wasn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by ioan
i said it wasn't applicable in this circumstance for two reasons:
1. the mclaren, on hotter dry tyres in the wet than the ferrari, had demonstrably more mechanical grip, therefore had the ability to nullify that effect on the way out of the corner.
2. had the concertina effect played out as per the theory, they would have both crossed the start-finish line at the same speed. they didn't, because the data showed the mclaren to be travelling 6.7km/h slower than the ferrari at the start-finish line.
the actual reason kimi was overtaken was that he braked far, far earlier in the wet (not all his fault, the ferrari dumps tyre temperature in the wet far quicker than the mclaren) and hamilton didn't.
let's see, then. slower than his opponent on the straight by 6.7km/h,when he normally should have been travelling at or near the same speed. sorry. no advantage there.
certainly not when compared to the unpunished incidents pointed out in the past.